A randomized prospective study of cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections

被引:18
|
作者
Garbino, J.
Villiger, P.
Caviezel, A.
Matulionyte, R.
Uckay, I.
Morel, P.
Lew, D.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Infect Dis, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Visceral Surg, Dept Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s15010-007-6237-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Presumptive antimicrobial therapy is an important aspect of the management of intra-abdominal infections. Together with surgery, antimicrobial combinations are still widely used to achieve the required spectrum of activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of parenteral cefepime + metronidazole vs imipenemcilastatin for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections in adult patients. Methods: Patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection were randomized to one of two treatment regimens: cefepime 2 g iv/12 h plus metronidazole 500 mg/8 h or imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg iv/6 h. The primary measure of clinical response was the decline of pre-treatment signs and symptoms of infection. The duration of follow-up was 30 days. Treatment failure was defined as either a lack of improvement or a worsening of pre-treatment signs and symptoms of infection. Surgical management of the infection was determined by the surgeon-in-charge. Results: Of the 122 intended-to-treat patients included in the study, 60 patients (33 men) were randomized to cefepime + metronidazole and 61 (27 men) to imipenemcilastatin. Cefepime + metronidazole treatment was successful in 52 (87%) patients and imipenem-cilastatin in 44 (72%) patients (p = 0.004). Microbiological eradication was established in similar proportions in both groups (cefepime + metronidazole, 43; imipenem-cilastatin, 38). Conclusion: Further studies are warranted to confirm the better results with the cefepime + metronidazole regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 166
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN WITH CLINDAMYCIN AND GENTAMICIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS SURGICAL INFECTIONS
    HACKFORD, AW
    TALLY, FP
    REINHOLD, RB
    BARZA, M
    GORBACH, SL
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1988, 123 (03) : 322 - 326
  • [22] EFFICACY OF FCE-22101 COMPARED WITH IMIPENEM AND WITH GENTAMICIN PLUS METRONIDAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS IN RATS
    NORD, CE
    LAHNBORG, G
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 23 : 137 - 141
  • [23] Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: A multicenter, evaluator-blind, prospective, randomized study
    Zanetti, G
    Bally, F
    Greub, G
    Garbino, J
    Kinge, T
    Lew, D
    Romand, JA
    Bille, J
    Aymon, D
    Stratchounski, L
    Krawczyk, L
    Rubinstein, E
    Schaller, MD
    Chiolero, R
    Glauser, MP
    Cometta, A
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (11) : 3442 - 3447
  • [24] Imipenem-cilastatin in treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs)
    Loran, O
    Beloborodov, V
    Sinyakova, L
    Kosova, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2004, 24 : S213 - S213
  • [25] THE IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN COMBINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF DOCUMENTED INFECTIONS IN THE HEMATOONCOLOGY PATIENT
    ESPINOUSE, D
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1990, 19 (13): : 625 - 628
  • [26] SINGLE DOSE IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN COMPARED WITH 3 DOSES OF CEFUROXIME AND METRONIDAZOLE AS PROPHYLAXIS IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    PACELLI, F
    BRISINDA, G
    BELLANTONE, R
    DOGLIETTO, GB
    CRUCITTI, F
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 3 (06) : 372 - 375
  • [27] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF GENTAMICIN AND CLINDAMYCIN VS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN IN SERIOUS INFECTIONS
    DANZIGER, LH
    CREGER, RJ
    STELLATO, TA
    HAU, T
    DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1985, 19 (06): : 455 - 455
  • [28] Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection
    Dietrich, ES
    Schubert, B
    Ebner, W
    Daschner, F
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (01) : 79 - 94
  • [29] Imipenem/cilastatin (1.5 g daily) versus meropenem (3.0 g daily) in patients with intra-abdominal infections: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial
    Basoli, A
    Meli, EZ
    Mazzocchi, P
    Speranza, V
    Lezoche, E
    Guerrieri, M
    Marrano, D
    Minni, F
    Giulini, SM
    Nodari, F
    Brotzu, G
    Loddo, P
    Latteri, F
    Scuderi, G
    Rodolico, G
    Cavallaro, L
    Donini, I
    Sortini, A
    Tonelli, F
    Spini, S
    Natale, C
    Musto, V
    Vio, A
    Verdecchia, G
    Morgagni, D
    Mariani, L
    Montefusco, A
    Gerosa, E
    Tiberio, G
    Nardone, A
    Mazzeo, F
    Benassai, G
    DAmico, D
    Tropea, A
    Piervittori, M
    Becelli, S
    Cazzaniga, M
    Stagnitti, F
    Crucitti, F
    Pacelli, F
    Gargiulo, A
    Panichi, G
    DiRosa, R
    Porzio, R
    Lombardi, U
    Stipa, V
    Chirletti, P
    DeAnna, D
    Pisano, I
    Armenio, S
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 29 (05) : 503 - 508
  • [30] COMPARISON OF IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN WITH THE COMBINATION OF AZTREONAM AND CLINDAMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS
    DEGROOT, HGW
    HUSTINX, PA
    LAMPE, AS
    OOSTERWIJK, WM
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 32 (03) : 491 - 500