The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks

被引:22
|
作者
Lema, Alberto [1 ]
Carvalho, Sandra [1 ,6 ]
Fregni, Felipe [2 ,3 ]
Goncalves, Oscar F. [4 ]
Leite, Jorge [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Sch Psychol, CIPsi, Psychol Neurosci Lab, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Spaulding Neuromodulat Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Proact Lab, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Portucalense Univ, I2P Portucalense Inst Psychol, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Aveiro, Dept Educ & Psychol, Campus Univ Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
SPEED-ACCURACY TRADEOFF; STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEURAL MECHANISMS; WORKING-MEMORY; ANODAL TDCS; BRAIN; CONNECTIVITY; DYNAMICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention
    Stone, David B.
    Tesche, Claudia D.
    NEUROREPORT, 2009, 20 (12) : 1115 - 1119
  • [42] A Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Attention Modulation in Healthy Subjects
    Arani, Mahmud Naraqi
    Yadollahpour, Ali
    Hosseini, Seyed Ahmad
    Riahi, Forough
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2016, 5 (02): : 398 - 406
  • [43] CEREBRAL RECALIBRATION AND MOTIVATED ATTENTION: A TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION STUDY
    Hortensius, Ruud
    Harmon-Jones, Eddie
    Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 47 : S73 - S73
  • [44] The influence of transcranial direct current stimulation to the trigeminal nerve on attention and arousal
    Torres, Alexis S.
    Robison, Matthew K.
    McClure, Samuel M.
    Brewer, Gene A.
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 24 (05) : 860 - 880
  • [45] Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on the cortical excitability
    Moliadze, V.
    Chaeib, L.
    Terney, D.
    Antal, A.
    Paulus, W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 15 : 273 - 273
  • [46] Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on cortical excitability
    Terney, D.
    Chaieb, L.
    Moliadze, V.
    Antal, A.
    Paulus, W.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2008, 23 (01) : S8 - S8
  • [47] Electroencephalographic Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation in the Auditory Cortex
    Van Doren, Jessica
    Langguth, Berthold
    Schecklmann, Martin
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (06) : 807 - 812
  • [48] Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence
    Murphy, O. W.
    Hoy, K. E.
    Wong, D.
    Bailey, N. W.
    Fitzgerald, P. B.
    Segrave, R. A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (05) : 1370 - 1380
  • [49] Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat
    Bolzoni, F.
    Baczyk, M.
    Jankowska, E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (16): : 4027 - 4042
  • [50] Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Woods, Adam J.
    Bryant, Vaughn
    Sacchetti, Daniela
    Gervits, Felix
    Hamilton, Roy
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) : 515 - 519