The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks

被引:22
|
作者
Lema, Alberto [1 ]
Carvalho, Sandra [1 ,6 ]
Fregni, Felipe [2 ,3 ]
Goncalves, Oscar F. [4 ]
Leite, Jorge [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Sch Psychol, CIPsi, Psychol Neurosci Lab, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Spaulding Neuromodulat Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Proact Lab, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Portucalense Univ, I2P Portucalense Inst Psychol, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Aveiro, Dept Educ & Psychol, Campus Univ Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
SPEED-ACCURACY TRADEOFF; STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEURAL MECHANISMS; WORKING-MEMORY; ANODAL TDCS; BRAIN; CONNECTIVITY; DYNAMICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation exert no effect on sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia
    Hohenester, Michaela
    Langguth, Berthold
    Wetter, Thomas Christian
    Geisler, Peter
    Schecklmann, Martin
    Reissmann, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [22] Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual attention span
    Wang C.-K.
    Wu F.
    Di Y.
    Zhang J.
    Li C.
    Ji L.
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2020, 60 (12): : 999 - 1006
  • [23] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Brain Networks Related to Creative Thinking
    Koizumi, Koji
    Ueda, Kazutaka
    Li, Ziyang
    Nakao, Masayuki
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [24] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Stroke Based on Brain Functional Networks
    Yu, Hongli
    Wang, Hongli
    Liu, Mengmeng
    Wang, Chunfang
    Sun, Changcheng
    Xu, Guizhi
    Guo, Lei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2021, 57 (06)
  • [25] Investigating the Neurophysiological Effects of Direct Current Stimulation
    Rojas, Joaquin
    Hamilton, Roy
    Luminais, Christopher
    Siegel, Steven
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [26] Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Giordano, James
    Bikson, Marom
    Kappenman, Emily S.
    Clark, Vincent P.
    Coslett, H. Branch
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    Hamilton, Roy
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kozumbo, Walter J.
    McKinley, R. Andrew
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reilly, J. Patrick
    Richardson, Jessica
    Wurzman, Rachel
    Calabrese, Edward
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2017, 15 (01):
  • [27] Investigating the Neurophysiological Effects of Direct Current Stimulation
    Rojas, Joaquin
    Hamilton, Roy
    Luminais, Christopher
    Siegel, Steven
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [28] Shaping semantic networks with transcranial direct current stimulation
    Perry, Lynn K.
    Lewis, Molly L.
    Lupyan, Gary
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (11): : 1891 - 1907
  • [29] Modulation effects of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsal attention and frontal parietal networks and its association with placebo and nocebo effects
    Sacca, Valeria
    Wen, Ya
    Hodges, Sierra
    Kong, Jian
    NEUROIMAGE, 2023, 284
  • [30] Cerebellum and attention networks functioning: findings from a cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Attention Network Test study
    Mannarelli, D.
    Pauletti, C.
    Panzini, C.
    Corrado, A.
    Delle Chiaie, R.
    Fattapposta, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 131 : S113 - S114