Interaction Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacokinetic Controlled Trial

被引:38
|
作者
Pascual, Julio [1 ]
del Castillo, Domingo [2 ]
Cabello, Mercedes [3 ]
Pallardo, Luis [4 ]
Grinyo, Josep M. [5 ]
Fernandez, Ana M. [6 ]
Brunet, Merce [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Reina Sofia, Serv Nefrol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[4] Hosp Dr Peset, Serv Nefrol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Bellvitge Hosp, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Nefrol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Lab Farmacol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Everolimus; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics; Renal transplant; SIROLIMUS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; REJECTION; RAPAMYCIN; RAT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ccd7f2
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation. Methods. A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant. Results. A higher TACC(min) was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). C(min)-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively). Conclusions. We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Outcomes Based On Everolimus Concentrations in Combination With Tacrolimus and Prednisone in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Kelly, N.
    Gralla, J.
    Lewis, V.
    Cooper, J.
    Adebiyi, O.
    Klem, P.
    Wiseman, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 454 - 454
  • [32] Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem - Dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients
    Jones, TE
    Morris, RG
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (05) : 381 - 388
  • [33] Population Pharmacokinetic Profiling of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients (RTRs) Taking Diltiazem
    Trevillian, P.
    Heer, M.
    Ainsworth, S.
    Hibberd, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 739 - 739
  • [34] Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of everolimus and low-exposure tacrolimus on graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients
    Taber, David J.
    Chokkalingam, Avudaiappan
    Su, Zemin
    Self, Sally
    Miller, Dylan
    Srinivas, Titte
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 33 (10)
  • [35] SOTRASTAURIN, A NOVEL PROTEIN KINASE C-INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH TACROLIMUS: PHARMACOKINETIC INTERACTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Steiger, J. U.
    Budde, K.
    Grinyo, J. M.
    Rostaing, L.
    Arns, W.
    Dantal, J.
    Slade, A.
    Barten, M. J.
    Kovarik, J. M.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 : 116 - 116
  • [36] Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Minimization Preserves Renal Function in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients
    Shihab, F.
    Qazi, Y.
    Kaplan, B.
    Kim, D.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    Peddi, V.
    Shaffer, D.
    Patel, D.
    McCague, K.
    Vincenti, F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 538 - 539
  • [37] Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and corticosteroids in liver transplant patients
    Provenzani, Alessio
    Di Stefano, Roberta
    Bavetta, Silvana
    Cammarata, Silvia
    Carollo, Anna
    Polidori, Piera
    Romano, Michael J.
    Sidoti, Maria Grazia
    Venuti, Francesca
    Zampardi, Valentina
    D'Alessandro, Natale
    Vizzini, Giovanni
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (01): : 48 - 48
  • [38] A Randomized, Prospective Study Comparing Everolimus/low Tacrolimus With Regular Tacrolimus/MPS for the Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients
    David-Neto, E.
    Galante, N.
    Altona, M.
    Paula, F.
    Triboni, A.
    Ramos, F.
    Agena, F.
    Nahas, W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 549 - 549
  • [39] Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and clarithromycin in a heart transplant patient
    Kunicki, PK
    Sobieszczanska-Malek, M
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2005, 27 (01) : 107 - 108
  • [40] Investigation of in vivo interaction between DNA-polymerase inhibitors and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients
    Ferchichi, K.
    Ben Hammamia, S.
    El Jebari, H.
    Ben Sassi, M.
    Charfi, R.
    Daghfous, R.
    Gaies, E.
    Trabelsi, S.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 : 207 - 207