Interaction Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacokinetic Controlled Trial

被引:38
|
作者
Pascual, Julio [1 ]
del Castillo, Domingo [2 ]
Cabello, Mercedes [3 ]
Pallardo, Luis [4 ]
Grinyo, Josep M. [5 ]
Fernandez, Ana M. [6 ]
Brunet, Merce [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Reina Sofia, Serv Nefrol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[4] Hosp Dr Peset, Serv Nefrol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Bellvitge Hosp, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Nefrol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Lab Farmacol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Everolimus; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics; Renal transplant; SIROLIMUS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; REJECTION; RAPAMYCIN; RAT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ccd7f2
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation. Methods. A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant. Results. A higher TACC(min) was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). C(min)-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively). Conclusions. We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Tacrolimus and DiltiazemDose-Response Relationship in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients
    Terry E. Jones
    Raymond G. Morris
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2002, 41 : 381 - 388
  • [22] Sotrastaurin Combined with Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: New Insights into a Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction
    Kovarik, J. M.
    Tedesco-Silva, H.
    Kuypers, D.
    Cohney, S.
    Budde, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 : 351 - 351
  • [23] Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvastatin XL and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients
    Holdaas, H
    Hagen, E
    Åsberg, A
    Lund, K
    Hartman, A
    Vaidyanathan, S
    Prasad, P
    He, YL
    Yeh, CM
    Bigler, H
    Rouilly, M
    Denouel, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 44 (04) : 163 - 171
  • [24] Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus
    Kovarik, J. M.
    Curtis, J. J.
    Hricik, D. E.
    Pescovitz, M. D.
    Scantlebury, V.
    Vasquez, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) : 3456 - 3458
  • [25] A pilot trial of tacrolimus, sirolimus, and steroids in renal transplant recipients
    Shapiro, R
    Scantlebury, VP
    Jordan, ML
    Vivas, CA
    Jain, A
    Hakala, TR
    McCauley, J
    Johnston, J
    Randhawa, P
    Fedorek, S
    Gray, E
    Chesky, A
    Dvorchik, I
    Donaldson, J
    Fung, JJ
    Starzl, TE
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1651 - 1652
  • [26] Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of cyclosporine and tacrolimus with colchicine in renal allograft recipients
    Beaudreuil, S.
    Becquemont, L.
    Schermann, J. M.
    Verstuyft, C.
    Barrail-Tran, A.
    Smirnova, M.
    Durrbach, A.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 32 : 68 - 68
  • [27] Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of cyclosporine and tacrolimus with colchicine in renal allograft recipients
    Beaudreuil, Severine
    Schermann, Jean Michel
    Verstuyft, Celine
    Barrail-Tran, Aurelie
    Smirnova, Maria
    Durrbach, Antoine
    Becquemont, Laurent
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (11)
  • [28] EVEROLIMUS (EVE) ASSOCIACTED TO TACROLIMUS (TAC) IN MAINTENANCE RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS AS IMMUNOSUPPRESSION TREATMENT
    Rengel, Manuel
    Abad, Soraya
    Vega, Almudena
    Verde, Eduardo
    Verdalles, Ursula
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 748 - 748
  • [29] Clinical Outcomes Based On Everolimus Concentrations in Combination With Tacrolimus and Prednisone in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Kelly, N.
    Gralla, J.
    Lewis, V.
    Cooper, J.
    Adebiyi, O.
    Klem, P.
    Wiseman, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 454 - 454
  • [30] PERIODONTAL INFLAMMATION IN LIVING KIDNEY DONORS AND RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS RECEIVING EVEROLIMUS OR TACROLIMUS
    Pereira-Lopes, Otilia
    Sampaio-Maia, Benedita
    Sampaio, Susana
    Braga, Ana C.
    Felino, Antonio
    Pestana, Manuel
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 : 199 - 199