Validation of asthma recording in electronic health records: protocol for a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Nissen, Francis [1 ]
Quint, Jennifer K. [2 ]
Wilkinson, Samantha [1 ]
Mullerova, Hana [3 ]
Smeeth, Liam [1 ]
Douglas, Ian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Res & Dev Ltd, RWD & Epidemiol, Uxbridge, Middx, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 05期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
asthma; Electronic Health Records; Negative Predictive Value; Positive Predictive Value; sensitivity; specificity; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014694
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Asthma is a common, heterogeneous disease with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. It can be difficult to define in epidemiological studies using electronic health records as the diagnosis is based on non-specific respiratory symptoms and spirometry, neither of which are routinely registered. Electronic health records can nonetheless be valuable to study the epidemiology, management, healthcare use and control of asthma. For health databases to be useful sources of information, asthma diagnoses should ideally be validated. The primary objectives are to provide an overview of the methods used to validate asthma diagnoses in electronic health records and summarise the results of the validation studies. Methods EMBASE and MEDLINE will be systematically searched for appropriate search terms. The searches will cover all studies in these databases up to October 2016 with no start date and will yield studies that have validated algorithms or codes for the diagnosis of asthma in electronic health records. At least one test validation measure (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value or other) is necessary for inclusion. In addition, we require the validated algorithms to be compared with an external golden standard, such as a manual review, a questionnaire or an independent second database. We will summarise key data including author, year of publication, country, time period, date, data source, population, case characteristics, clinical events, algorithms, gold standard and validation statistics in a uniform table. Ethics and dissemination This study is a synthesis of previously published studies and, therefore, no ethical approval is required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Results from this systematic review can be used to study outcome research on asthma and can be used to identify case definitions for asthma. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016041798.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of electronic health records in improving pediatric nursing care: a systematic review
    Al-Shammari, Moustafa A.
    Jaafar, Jaafar Sadiq
    Elfeshawy, Reda
    EGYPTIAN PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION GAZETTE, 2024, 72 (01)
  • [32] A systematic review of the attributes of electronic personal health Records for Patients with multiple sclerosis
    Nasim Aslani
    Maryam Ahmadi
    Mahnaz Samadbeik
    Health and Technology, 2020, 10 : 587 - 599
  • [33] A systematic review of the attributes of electronic personal health Records for Patients with multiple sclerosis
    Aslani, Nasim
    Ahmadi, Maryam
    Samadbeik, Mahnaz
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (03) : 587 - 599
  • [34] Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review
    Piasecki, Jan
    Walkiewicz-Zarek, Ewa
    Figas-Skrzypulec, Justyna
    Kordecka, Anna
    Dranseika, Vilius
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 24 (04) : 633 - 658
  • [35] An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review
    Ellsworth, Marc A.
    Dziadzko, Mikhail
    O'Horo, John C.
    Farrell, Ann M.
    Zhang, Jiajie
    Herasevich, Vitaly
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (01) : 218 - 226
  • [36] The Use of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review
    Irani, Jihad S.
    Middleton, Jennifer L.
    Marfatia, Ruta
    Omana, Evelyn T.
    D'Amico, Frank
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (05) : 553 - 562
  • [37] Utilization of Electronic Health Records for Chronic Disease Surveillance: A Systematic Literature Review
    Guralnik, Elina
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [38] The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review
    Poissant, L
    Pereira, J
    Tamblyn, R
    Kawasumi, Y
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 12 (05) : 505 - 516
  • [39] Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Meier-Diedrich, Eva
    Davidge, Gail
    Haegglund, Maria
    Kharko, Anna
    Lyckblad, Camilla
    McMillan, Brian
    Blease, Charlotte
    Schwarz, Julian
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [40] Electronic health records (EHR) simulation-based training: a scoping review protocol
    Nuamah, Joseph K.
    Adapa, Karthik
    Mazur, Lukasz
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):