Validation of asthma recording in electronic health records: protocol for a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Nissen, Francis [1 ]
Quint, Jennifer K. [2 ]
Wilkinson, Samantha [1 ]
Mullerova, Hana [3 ]
Smeeth, Liam [1 ]
Douglas, Ian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Res & Dev Ltd, RWD & Epidemiol, Uxbridge, Middx, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 05期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
asthma; Electronic Health Records; Negative Predictive Value; Positive Predictive Value; sensitivity; specificity; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014694
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Asthma is a common, heterogeneous disease with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. It can be difficult to define in epidemiological studies using electronic health records as the diagnosis is based on non-specific respiratory symptoms and spirometry, neither of which are routinely registered. Electronic health records can nonetheless be valuable to study the epidemiology, management, healthcare use and control of asthma. For health databases to be useful sources of information, asthma diagnoses should ideally be validated. The primary objectives are to provide an overview of the methods used to validate asthma diagnoses in electronic health records and summarise the results of the validation studies. Methods EMBASE and MEDLINE will be systematically searched for appropriate search terms. The searches will cover all studies in these databases up to October 2016 with no start date and will yield studies that have validated algorithms or codes for the diagnosis of asthma in electronic health records. At least one test validation measure (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value or other) is necessary for inclusion. In addition, we require the validated algorithms to be compared with an external golden standard, such as a manual review, a questionnaire or an independent second database. We will summarise key data including author, year of publication, country, time period, date, data source, population, case characteristics, clinical events, algorithms, gold standard and validation statistics in a uniform table. Ethics and dissemination This study is a synthesis of previously published studies and, therefore, no ethical approval is required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Results from this systematic review can be used to study outcome research on asthma and can be used to identify case definitions for asthma. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016041798.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Kruse, Clemens Scott
    Stein, Anna
    Thomas, Heather
    Kaur, Harmander
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (11)
  • [22] Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review
    Gandrup, Julie
    Ali, Syed Mustafa
    McBeth, John
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    Dixon, William G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (11) : 1752 - 1763
  • [23] Patterns of multimorbidity in primary care electronic health records: A systematic review
    Beridze, Giorgi
    Abbadi, Ahmad
    Ars, Joan
    Remelli, Francesca
    Vetrano, Davide L.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Perez, Laura-Monica
    Lopez-Rodriguez, Juan A.
    Calderon-Larranaga, Amaia
    JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY, 2024, 14
  • [24] Usability of Electronic Health Records from Nurses' Perspectives: A Systematic Review
    Park, Suhyun
    Marquard, Jenna
    Austin, Robin
    Pieczkiewicz, David
    Delaney, Connie
    2022 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI 2022), 2022, : 511 - 512
  • [25] Access control management in electronic health records: a systematic literature review
    Carrion Senor, Inmaculada
    Fernandez Aleman, Jose Luis
    Toval, Ambrosio
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2012, 26 (05) : 463 - 468
  • [26] Evaluation of synthetic electronic health records: A systematic review and experimental assessment
    Budu, Emmanuella
    Etminani, Kobra
    Soliman, Amira
    Rognvaldsson, Thorsteinn
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2024, 603
  • [27] Using Electronic Health Records to Address Overweight and Obesity A Systematic Review
    Baer, Heather J.
    Cho, Insook
    Walmer, Rebecca A.
    Bain, Paul A.
    Bates, David W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (04) : 494 - 500
  • [28] Acupuncture for asthma: Protocol for a systematic review
    Li, Meng
    Zhang, Xing
    Bao, Haipeng
    Li, Chunlei
    Zhang, Peitong
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (26)
  • [29] Exploring the relationship between electronic health records and provider burnout: A systematic review
    Yan, Qi
    Jiang, Zheng
    Harbin, Zachary
    Tolbert, Preston H.
    Davies, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (05) : 1009 - 1021
  • [30] Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review
    Jan Piasecki
    Ewa Walkiewicz-Żarek
    Justyna Figas-Skrzypulec
    Anna Kordecka
    Vilius Dranseika
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2021, 24 : 633 - 658