Risk Manageability Assessment to Improve Risk Response Plan: Case Study of Construction Projects in Iran

被引:18
|
作者
Charkhakan, Mohammad Hadi [1 ]
Heravi, Gholamreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, 16 Azar Ave,POB 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Risk management; Change management; Risk manageability; Change-formation path; Risk responses; Risk signs; Construction projects; EARLY WARNING SIGNS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001562
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The majority of qualitative risk assessment studies on construction projects assess manageability indicators (e.g.,detectability, preventability, and controllability) independently of risk probability and impact, two main risk parameters. This study develops a model for assessing the risk manageability indicators by linking manageability to the chain of risks. Such risk manageability indicators may improve risk response plans. The chain of risks in the change-formation phase is used as the basis to determine why any change in a construction project is generally caused by a chain of risks. Focus is directed to the chain of risks in the change-formation phase that determine part of the probability of change. In this phase, final risks (causes) that correspond to uncertain events occur because of the presence of sources and drivers. This model defines a risk scenario as all paths between a source and a risk (cause). Drivers in the paths between sources and final risk are the signs of risk scenarios. This study evaluates the manageability indicators by using the observability of drivers of the chain of risks to define and assess two indices of detectability and trackability as two main components of the developed framework. These indices are used to improve the response plan to mitigate risk. Finally, to demonstrate the framework capabilities, a real construction project as an application example is analyzed. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge through evaluating the manageability of risk scenarios by defining the relationship between risk sources and risk signs (drivers). It also helps to expand existing knowledge by developing an approach for identifying and mitigating risk causes after the observation of risk signs. This evaluation may alert project management teams in advance of risk occurrence so that they can take necessary actions to reduce the probability of the risk. The results indicate that a project team should be aware that after observing a driver (risk sign) in a project, parts of previous paths in which no driver is observed may lose their importance, and that the importance of some paths in which observed drivers exist intensifies. Moreover, a project team's observations may sometimes reduce the importance of remaining paths and direct the team to concentrate on taking appropriate measures to enable immediate prevention from a scenario's endpoint (cause).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Assessment Models to Improve Environmental Safety in the Field of the Economy and Organization of Construction: A Case Study of Russia
    Larionov, Arkadiy
    Nezhnikova, Ekaterina
    Smirnova, Elena
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [42] Risk allocation in public construction projects: the case of Jordan
    Hiyassat, Mohammed A.
    Alkasagi, Fatima
    El-Mashaleh, Mohammad
    Sweis, Ghaleb J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (08) : 1478 - 1488
  • [43] Risk assessment of water supply system safety based on WHO Water Safety Plan; Case study: Ardabil, Iran
    Aghaei, Mina
    Nabizade, Ramin
    Nasseri, Simin
    Naddafi, Kazem
    Mahvi, Amir Hossein
    Karimzade, Sima
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 80 : 133 - 141
  • [44] Risk assessment of water supply system safety based on WHOs water safety plan: case study Semnan, Iran
    Razmju, Vahid
    Moeinian, Khalilollah
    Rahmani, Ayat
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2019, 164 : 162 - 170
  • [45] Risk Response Development in Construction Projects Delay: Multiple Case Studies from UAE
    Motaleb, Omayma
    [J]. ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [46] Risk assessment and water safety plan: case study in Beijing, China
    Ye, Bixiong
    Chen, Yuansheng
    Li, Yonghua
    Li, Hairong
    Yang, Linsheng
    Wang, Wuyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2015, 13 (02) : 510 - 521
  • [47] Political Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Construction Enterprises
    Chang, Tengyuan
    Deng, Xiaopeng
    Hwang, Bon-Gang
    Zhao, Xiaojing
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [48] Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors
    Liu, Junying
    Zhao, Xianbo
    Yan, Peng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (06)
  • [49] Risk factors in oil and gas construction projects in developing countries: a case study
    Kassem, Mukhtar A.
    Khoiry, Muhamad Azry
    Hamzah, Noraini
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2019, 13 (04) : 846 - 861
  • [50] Risk assessment in poplar plantations: a case study from northern Iran
    Namdari, Samaneh
    Adeli, Kamran
    Limaei, Soleiman Mohammadi
    Bahramabadi, Zahra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (04) : 1225 - 1233