Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models

被引:33
|
作者
Kerestes, Courtney [1 ]
Murayama, Sarah [2 ]
Tyson, Jasmine [1 ]
Natavio, Melissa [1 ]
Seamon, Elisabeth [2 ]
Raidoo, Shandhini [1 ]
Lacar, Lea [2 ]
Bowen, Emory [1 ]
Soon, Reni [1 ]
Platais, Ingrida [3 ]
Kaneshiro, Bliss [1 ]
Stowers, Paris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Gynuity Hlth Projects, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Medication abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Telemedicine; Ultrasound; COVID-19; MIFEPRISTONE; MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate the effectiveness of medication abortion with the implementation of telemedicine and a no-test protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a medication abortion up to 77 days gestation at the University of Hawai'i between April and November 2020. Patients had the option of traditional in clinic care or telemedicine with either in clinic pickup or mailing of medications. During this time, a no-test protocol for medication abortion without prior labs or ultrasound was in place for eligible patients. The primary outcome was the rate of successful medication abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included abortion-related complications. Results: A total of 334 patients were dispensed mifepristone and misoprostol, 149 (4 4.6%) with telemedicine with in-person pickup of medications, 75 (22.5%) via telemedicine with medications mailed, and 110 (32.9%) via traditional in person visits. The overall rate of complete medication abortion without surgical intervention was 95.8%, with success rates of 96.8, 97.1, and 93.6% for the clinic pickup, mail, and clinic visit groups, respectively. Success for those without an ultrasound performed prior to the procedure was 96.6%, compared to 95.5% for those with ultrasound. We obtained follow-up data for 87.8% of participants. Conclusions: Medication abortion was safe and effective while offering multiple modes of care delivery including telemedicine visits without an ultrasound performed prior to dispensing medications. Implications: Incorporating telemedicine and a no-test protocol for medication abortion is safe and has the potential to expand access to abortion care. All care models had low rates of adverse events, which contradicts the idea that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategyincreases the safety of medication abortion. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early abortion care during the COVID-19 public health emergency in Ireland: Implications for law, policy, and service delivery
    Spillane, Alison
    Taylor, Maeve
    Henchion, Caitriona
    Venables, Roisin
    Conlon, Catherine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 154 (02) : 379 - 384
  • [42] Adaptations to comprehensive abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies of provision in Bolivia, Mali, Nepal, and the occupied Palestinian territory
    Sorhaindo, Annik Mahalia
    Castle, Sarah
    Flomen, Lola
    Lathrop, Eva
    Mohagheghpour, Shirine
    Dabash, Rasha
    Toedtli, Francelle Kwankam
    Wilkins, Rebecca
    Laser, Laurence
    Titulaer, Patricia
    Nyamato, Ernest
    Dakouo, Mary Lea
    Awadallah, Ammal
    Shrestha, Raman
    Morales, Malena
    Loi, Ulrika Rehnstrom
    SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [43] Child Health and Delivery of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond
    Mathew, Joseph L.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2020, 87 (08): : 579 - 582
  • [44] Telehealth for delivery of haemophilia comprehensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    O'Donovan, Mairead
    Buckley, Catherine
    Benson, Julie
    Roche, Sheila
    McGowan, Mark
    Parkinson, Laura
    Byrne, Patricia
    Rooney, Gloria
    Bergin, Catherine
    Walsh, Deirdre
    Bird, Rachel
    McGroarty, Feargal
    Fogarty, Helen
    Smyth, Elizabeth
    Ahmed, Saad
    O'Donnell, James S.
    Ryan, Kevin
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Dougall, Alison
    O'Connell, Niamh M.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2020, 26 (06) : 984 - 990
  • [45] Challenges in the Delivery of Rural Otolaryngology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Losenegger, Tasher
    Urban, Matthew J.
    Jagasia, Ashok J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 165 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [46] Child Health and Delivery of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond
    Joseph L. Mathew
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2020, 87 : 579 - 582
  • [47] Challenges in the delivery of critical care in India during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi
    Myatra, Sheila Nainan
    Mathew, Meghena
    Lodh, Nirmalyo
    Divatia, Jigeeshu Vasishtha
    Hammond, Naomi
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
    JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2021, 22 (04) : 342 - 348
  • [48] The impact of telemedicine on the delivery of dermatologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Pahalyants, Vartan
    Murphy, William
    Gunasekera, Nicole
    Kroshinsky, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 85 (03) : AB198 - AB198
  • [49] Delivery of safe emergency surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Tang, Man Hon
    Goo, Tiong Jerry
    Pradesh, Prajwala S.
    Kang, Minli
    Lim, Kheng Tian
    Tan, Kok Yang
    Ong, Marc Weijie
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 63 (10) : 630 - 631