Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models

被引:33
|
作者
Kerestes, Courtney [1 ]
Murayama, Sarah [2 ]
Tyson, Jasmine [1 ]
Natavio, Melissa [1 ]
Seamon, Elisabeth [2 ]
Raidoo, Shandhini [1 ]
Lacar, Lea [2 ]
Bowen, Emory [1 ]
Soon, Reni [1 ]
Platais, Ingrida [3 ]
Kaneshiro, Bliss [1 ]
Stowers, Paris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Gynuity Hlth Projects, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Medication abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Telemedicine; Ultrasound; COVID-19; MIFEPRISTONE; MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate the effectiveness of medication abortion with the implementation of telemedicine and a no-test protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a medication abortion up to 77 days gestation at the University of Hawai'i between April and November 2020. Patients had the option of traditional in clinic care or telemedicine with either in clinic pickup or mailing of medications. During this time, a no-test protocol for medication abortion without prior labs or ultrasound was in place for eligible patients. The primary outcome was the rate of successful medication abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included abortion-related complications. Results: A total of 334 patients were dispensed mifepristone and misoprostol, 149 (4 4.6%) with telemedicine with in-person pickup of medications, 75 (22.5%) via telemedicine with medications mailed, and 110 (32.9%) via traditional in person visits. The overall rate of complete medication abortion without surgical intervention was 95.8%, with success rates of 96.8, 97.1, and 93.6% for the clinic pickup, mail, and clinic visit groups, respectively. Success for those without an ultrasound performed prior to the procedure was 96.6%, compared to 95.5% for those with ultrasound. We obtained follow-up data for 87.8% of participants. Conclusions: Medication abortion was safe and effective while offering multiple modes of care delivery including telemedicine visits without an ultrasound performed prior to dispensing medications. Implications: Incorporating telemedicine and a no-test protocol for medication abortion is safe and has the potential to expand access to abortion care. All care models had low rates of adverse events, which contradicts the idea that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategyincreases the safety of medication abortion. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes to primary care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived impact on medication safety: A survey study
    Gleeson, Laura L.
    Ludlow, Aoife
    Wallace, Emma
    Argent, Rob
    Collins, Claire
    Clyne, Barbara
    Mellon, Lisa
    Barlow, James W.
    Ryan, Benedict
    De Brun, Aoife
    Holton, Alice
    Pate, Muriel
    Kirke, Ciara
    Flood, Michelle
    Moriarty, Frank
    EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY, 2022, 6
  • [32] An Experience of Multiple Sclerosis Telerehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Nora, Monica
    Giannarelli, Michela
    Zicchinella, Cristina
    Mammi, Patrizia
    Ranza, Elena
    Brianti, Rodolfo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2021, 100 (03) : 214 - 214
  • [33] Trends in Timing and Provision of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Care During COVID-19
    Noij, Kimberley S.
    Huang, Emily Y.
    Walsh, Jonathan
    Creighton, Francis X.
    Galaiya, Deepa
    Bowditch, Stephen P.
    Stewart, C. Matthew
    Jenks, Carolyn M.
    OTO OPEN, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [34] Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA
    Taida Wolfe
    Yana van der Meulen Rodgers
    Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2022, 19 : 541 - 548
  • [35] A Tertiary Care Hospital Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Filiz, Mine
    Yilmaz, Gulden
    Fidan, Gonca
    Kosger, Sumeyye
    Savasci, Umit
    Cekli, Yavuz
    Ocal, Nesrin
    Dogan, Deniz
    Arslan, Yakup
    Taskin, Gurhan
    Kara, Umut
    Kizilgun, Murat
    Yamanel, Levent
    Tasci, Canturk
    FLORA INFEKSIYON HASTALIKLARI VE KLINIK MIKROBIYOLOJI DERGISI, 2021, 26 (02): : 257 - 266
  • [36] Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA
    Wolfe, Taida
    Rodgers, Yana van der Meulen
    SEXUALITY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 19 (02) : 541 - 548
  • [37] Out of hours experience in primary care during COVID-19
    Santucci, Catherine
    McMaster, David
    Veremu, Munashe
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (06) : 865 - 865
  • [38] Disruptions to Abortion Care in Louisiana During Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Roberts, Sarah C. M.
    Berglas, Nancy F.
    Schroeder, Rosalyn
    Lingwall, Mary
    Grossman, Daniel
    White, Kari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 111 (08) : 1504 - 1512
  • [39] Enteral stoma care during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical advice
    Pata, Francesco
    Bondurri, Andrea
    Ferrara, Francesco
    Parini, Dario
    Rizzo, Gianluca
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (09) : 985 - 992
  • [40] Urological emergency care for patients with covid-19: Practical experience of specialized department
    Sukhikh, S. O.
    Malkhasyan, V. A.
    Kim, Y. A.
    Andreev, R. Y.
    Makhmudov, T. B.
    Pushkar, D. Y.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S981 - S981