Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance anglography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography - A meta-analysis

被引:45
|
作者
Danias, PG
Roussakis, A
Ioannidis, JPA
机构
[1] Hygeia Hosp, Cardiac MR Ctr, Maroussi 15123, Greece
[2] Hygeia Hosp, Cardiol Clin 2, Athens, Greece
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Clin Trials & Evidence Based Med Unit, Ioannina, Greece
[7] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Clin & Mol Epidemiol Unit, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Ioannina, Greece
[8] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Biomed Res Inst, Ioannina, Greece
[9] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to define the current role of coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Coronary magnetic resonance angiography has been proposed as a promising noninvasive method for diagnosis of CAD, but individual studies evaluating its clinical value have been of limited sample size. METHODS We identified all studies (MEDLINE and EMBASE) that evaluated CAD by both CMRA and conventional angiography in 10 subjects during the period 1991 to January 2004. We recorded true and false positive and true and false negative CMRA assessments for detection of CAD using X-ray angiography as the reference standard. Analysis was done at segment, vessel, and subject level. RESULTS We analyzed 39 studies (41 separate comparisons). Across 25 studies (27 comparisons) with data on 4,620 segments (993 subjects), sensitivity and specificity for detection of CAD were 73% and 86%, respectively. Vessel-level analyses (16 studies, 2,041 vessels) showed sensitivity 75% and specificity 85%. Subject-level analyses (13 studies, 607 subjects) showed sensitivity 88% and specificity 56%. At the segment level, sensitivity was 69% to 79% for all but the left circumflex (61%) coronary artery; specificity was 82% to 91%. There was considerable between-study heterogeneity, but weighted summary receiver-operating characteristic curves agreed with these estimates. There were no major differences between subgroups based on technical or population characteristics, year of publication, reported blinding, or sample size. CONCLUSIONS In evaluable segments of the native coronary arteries, CMRA has moderately high sensitivity for detecting significant proximal stenoses and may have value for exclusion of significant multivessel CAD in selected subjects considered for diagnostic catheterization. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1867 / 1876
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic performance of 64-row coronary CT angiography in detecting significant stenosis as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography
    Sajjadieh, Amirreza
    Hekmatnia, Ali
    Keivani, Maryam
    Asoodeh, Abdollah
    Pourmoghaddas, Masoud
    Sanei, Hamid
    ARYA ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2013, 9 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [32] The Performance of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Detecting Renal Artery Stenosis as Compared With Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Conventional Angiography as a Reference
    Liang, Keng-Wei
    Chen, Jhih-Wei
    Huang, Hsin-Hui
    Su, Chun-Hung
    Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
    Tsao, Teng-Fu
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (04) : 619 - 627
  • [33] Self-gated cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging compared with X-ray angiography: a pilot study
    Alexis Harrison
    Ganesh Adluru
    Brent Wilson
    Christopher McGann
    Edward DiBella
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [34] Meta-analysis: Diagnostic Performance of Low-Radiation-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
    von Ballmoos, Moritz Wyler
    Haring, Bernhard
    Juillerat, Pascal
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (06) : 413 - +
  • [35] Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer Tomography Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Stenosis Detection of Autologuous Hemodialysis Access: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Bin
    Li, Qiong
    Chen, Cong
    Guan, Yu
    Liu, Shiyuan
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [36] Lung ultrasound compared to chest X-ray for diagnosis of pediatric pneumonia: A meta-analysis
    Balk, Daniel S.
    Lee, Christine
    Schafer, Jesse
    Welwarth, Jeremy
    Hardin, John
    Novack, Victor
    Yarza, Shaked
    Hoffmann, Beatrice
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2018, 53 (08) : 1130 - 1139
  • [37] Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: Accuracy compared with intraarterial X-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens
    Fellner, C
    Lang, W
    Janka, R
    Wutke, R
    Bautz, W
    Fellner, FA
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 21 (04) : 424 - 431
  • [38] Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kiaos, Apostolos
    Tziatzios, Ioannis
    Hadjimiltiades, Stavros
    Karvounis, Charalambos
    Karamitsos, Theodoros D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 252 : 229 - 233
  • [39] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease -: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Debrey, Sarah M.
    Yu, Hua
    Lynch, John K.
    Loevblad, Karl-Olof
    Wright, Violet L.
    Janket, Sok-Ja D.
    Baird, Alison E.
    STROKE, 2008, 39 (08) : 2237 - 2248
  • [40] Coronary artery imaging in grown up congenital heart disease - Complementary role of magnetic resonance and X-ray coronary angiography
    Taylor, AM
    Thorne, SA
    Rubens, MB
    Jhooti, P
    Keegan, J
    Gatehouse, PD
    Wiesmann, F
    Grothues, F
    Somerville, J
    Pennell, DJ
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (14) : 1670 - 1678