Coronary artery imaging in grown up congenital heart disease - Complementary role of magnetic resonance and X-ray coronary angiography

被引:1
|
作者
Taylor, AM
Thorne, SA
Rubens, MB
Jhooti, P
Keegan, J
Gatehouse, PD
Wiesmann, F
Grothues, F
Somerville, J
Pennell, DJ
机构
[1] Royal Brompton Hosp, Cardiovasc Magnet Resonance Unit, London SW3 6NP, England
[2] Royal Brompton Hosp, Jane Somerville Grown Up Congenit Heart Unit, London SW3 6LY, England
[3] Royal Brompton Hosp, Dept Radiol, London SW3 6LY, England
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; arteries; heart disease; congenital; angiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There is a high incidence of anomalous coronary arteries in subjects with congenital heart disease. These abnormalities can be responsible for myocardial ischemia and sudden death or be damaged during surgical intervention. It can be difficult to define the proximal course of anomalous coronary arteries with the use of conventional x-ray coronary angiography. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) has been shown to be useful in the assessment of the 3-dimensional relationship between the coronary arteries and the great vessels in subjects with normal cardiac morphology but has not been used in patients with congenital heart disease. Methods and Results-Twenty-five adults with various congenital heart abnormalities were studied. X-ray coronary angiography and respiratory-gated MRCA were performed in all subjects. Coronary artery origin and proximal course were assessed for each imaging modality by separate, blinded investigators, images were then compared, and a consensus diagnosis was reached. With the consensus readings for both magnetic resonance and x-ray coronary angiography, it was possible to identify the origin and course of the proximal coronary arteries in all 25 subjects: 16 with coronary anomalies and 9 with normal coronary arteries. Respiratory-gated MRCA had an accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 88%, and a specificity of 100% for the detection of abnormal coronary arteries. The MRCA results were more likely to agree with the consensus for definition of the proximal course of the coronary arteries (P<0.02). Conclusions-For the assessment of anomalous coronary artery anatomy in patients with congenital heart discase, the use of the combination of MRCA with x-ray coronary angiography improves the definition of the proximal coronary artery course. MRCA provides correct spatial relationships, whereas x-ray angiography provides a view of the entire coronary length and its peripheral run-off. Further more, respiratory-gated MRCA can be performed without breath holding and with only limited subject cooperation.
引用
收藏
页码:1670 / 1678
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance angiography is equivalent to X-ray coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary arteries in Kawasaki disease
    Mavrogeni, S
    Papadopoulos, G
    Douskou, M
    Kaklis, S
    Seimenis, I
    Baras, P
    Nikolaidou, P
    Bakoula, C
    Karanasios, E
    Manginas, A
    Cokkinos, DV
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (04) : 649 - 652
  • [2] Detection of coronary artery disease by first pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: a comparison with positron emission tomography and x-ray coronary angiography
    Schwitter, J
    Bertschinger, K
    Nanz, D
    Kneifel, S
    Buechi, M
    Amann, FW
    Luescher, TF
    Marincek, B
    von Schulthess, GK
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 571 - 571
  • [3] Additive Role of Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
    Kim, Min Jeong
    Yoon, Yeonyee E.
    Park, Jin Joo
    Kim, Yeo Koon
    Chun, Eun Ju
    Choi, Sang Il
    Cho, Goo-Young
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2017, 47 (03) : 409 - 412
  • [4] Cost evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus coronary angiography for the work-up of coronary artery disease
    Moschetti, K.
    Pinget, C.
    Muzzarelli, S.
    Locca, D.
    Bruder, O.
    Mahrholdt, H.
    Schwitter, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 675 - 675
  • [5] Cost evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus coronary angiography for the work-up of coronary artery disease
    Moschetti, K.
    Pinget, C.
    Muzzarelli, S.
    Locca, D.
    Bruder, O.
    Mahrholdt, H.
    Schwitter, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183 : 675 - 675
  • [6] The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
    Klein, C
    Nekolla, SG
    Schwaiger, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2001, 90 (03): : 208 - 217
  • [7] Detection of coronary artery stenoses using breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Comparison with conventional X-ray angiography
    Leonetti, S.
    Licitra, R.
    Arrivi, A.
    Mirabelli, F.
    Scappaticci, M.
    Tanzilli, G.
    Gaudio, C.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 7 (03) : 266 - 266
  • [8] Magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional coronary angiography to diagnose coronary artery disease
    Schlueter, M
    Tuebler, T
    Steffens, JC
    Schofer, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 304 - 304
  • [9] X-Ray Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Distinguish Interarterial from Septal Courses of Anomalous Left Coronary Artery: An Ex Vivo Heart Model
    Desai, Ravi V.
    Gupta, Ritesh
    Litovsky, Silvio H.
    Nath, Hrudaya
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Singh, Satinder P.
    Evanochko, William T.
    Knobloch, Johnnie E.
    Lloyd, Steven G.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 21 (12): : 648 - 652
  • [10] Detection of coronary artery stenoses with whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography
    Ichikawa, Y
    Sakuma, H
    Suzawa, N
    Nagata, M
    Makino, K
    Hirano, T
    Takeda, K
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 643 - 644