Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance anglography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography - A meta-analysis

被引:45
|
作者
Danias, PG
Roussakis, A
Ioannidis, JPA
机构
[1] Hygeia Hosp, Cardiac MR Ctr, Maroussi 15123, Greece
[2] Hygeia Hosp, Cardiol Clin 2, Athens, Greece
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Clin Trials & Evidence Based Med Unit, Ioannina, Greece
[7] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Clin & Mol Epidemiol Unit, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Ioannina, Greece
[8] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Biomed Res Inst, Ioannina, Greece
[9] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to define the current role of coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Coronary magnetic resonance angiography has been proposed as a promising noninvasive method for diagnosis of CAD, but individual studies evaluating its clinical value have been of limited sample size. METHODS We identified all studies (MEDLINE and EMBASE) that evaluated CAD by both CMRA and conventional angiography in 10 subjects during the period 1991 to January 2004. We recorded true and false positive and true and false negative CMRA assessments for detection of CAD using X-ray angiography as the reference standard. Analysis was done at segment, vessel, and subject level. RESULTS We analyzed 39 studies (41 separate comparisons). Across 25 studies (27 comparisons) with data on 4,620 segments (993 subjects), sensitivity and specificity for detection of CAD were 73% and 86%, respectively. Vessel-level analyses (16 studies, 2,041 vessels) showed sensitivity 75% and specificity 85%. Subject-level analyses (13 studies, 607 subjects) showed sensitivity 88% and specificity 56%. At the segment level, sensitivity was 69% to 79% for all but the left circumflex (61%) coronary artery; specificity was 82% to 91%. There was considerable between-study heterogeneity, but weighted summary receiver-operating characteristic curves agreed with these estimates. There were no major differences between subgroups based on technical or population characteristics, year of publication, reported blinding, or sample size. CONCLUSIONS In evaluable segments of the native coronary arteries, CMRA has moderately high sensitivity for detecting significant proximal stenoses and may have value for exclusion of significant multivessel CAD in selected subjects considered for diagnostic catheterization. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1867 / 1876
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography - A meta-analysis
    Hamon, Michele
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
    Malagutti, Patrizia
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Morello, Remy
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Hamon, Martial
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 48 (09) : 1896 - 1910
  • [2] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 64-SLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AS COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY: META-ANALYSIS OF MULTICENTER STUDIES
    Hamon, Michele
    Gueret, Pascal
    Laissy, Jean-Pierre
    Hamon, Martial
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E919 - E919
  • [3] Effective dose from multislice CT calcium scoring and coronary anglography compared with conventional diagnostic coronary angiography
    Coles, DR
    Smail, M
    Negus, I
    Wilde, P
    Oberhoff, M
    Karsch, K
    Baumbach, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 267A - 267A
  • [4] Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography
    Schuijf, JD
    Bax, JJ
    Shaw, LJ
    de Roos, A
    Lamb, HJ
    van der Wall, EE
    Wijns, W
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (02) : 404 - 411
  • [5] Directed proximal magnetic resonance coronary angiography compared with conventional contrast coronary angiography
    Yoshino, H
    Nitatori, T
    Kachi, E
    Yano, K
    Taniuchi, M
    Hachiya, J
    Ishikawa, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 80 (04): : 514 - &
  • [6] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease
    Nelemans, PJ
    Leiner, T
    De Vet, HC
    Van Engelshoven, JM
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 238 - 238
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shingo Kato
    Mai Azuma
    Naoki Nakayama
    Kazuki Fukui
    Masanori Ito
    Naka Saito
    Nobuyuki Horita
    Daisuke Utsunomiya
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 25
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kato, Shingo
    Azuma, Mai
    Nakayama, Naoki
    Fukui, Kazuki
    Ito, Masanori
    Saito, Naka
    Horita, Nobuyuki
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [9] Magnetic resonance angiography is equivalent to X-ray coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary arteries in Kawasaki disease
    Mavrogeni, S
    Papadopoulos, G
    Douskou, M
    Kaklis, S
    Seimenis, I
    Baras, P
    Nikolaidou, P
    Bakoula, C
    Karanasios, E
    Manginas, A
    Cokkinos, DV
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (04) : 649 - 652
  • [10] Detection of coronary artery stenoses using breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Comparison with conventional X-ray angiography
    Leonetti, S.
    Licitra, R.
    Arrivi, A.
    Mirabelli, F.
    Scappaticci, M.
    Tanzilli, G.
    Gaudio, C.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 7 (03) : 266 - 266