Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography - A meta-analysis

被引:346
|
作者
Hamon, Michele
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
Malagutti, Patrizia
Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
Morello, Remy
Valgimigli, Marco
Hamon, Martial
机构
[1] CHU Caen, Serv Malad Coeur & Vaisseaux, Dept Radiol, F-14033 Caen, France
[2] CHU Caen, Dept Cardiol, F-14033 Caen, France
[3] CHU Caen, Dept Stat, F-14033 Caen, France
[4] Policlin San Donato, Hemodynam & Cardiovasc Radiol Serv, Milan, Italy
[5] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] AZ Middelheim, Cardiovasc Inst Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to define the current role of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) using a meta-analytic process. BACKGROUND Multislice spiral computed tomography has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CA) for the diagnosis of CAD. METHODS Using Medline, we identified 29 studies (2,024 patients) evaluating CAD by means of both MSCT (16 slices) and conventional CA before July 2006. After data extraction the analysis was performed according to a random-effects model. RESULTS The per-segment analysis pooled the results from 27 studies corresponding to a cumulative number of 22,798 segments. Among unassessable segments, 4.2% were excluded from the analysis and 6.4% were classified at the discretion of the investigators, underscoring the shortcomings of MSCT. With this major limitation, the per-segment sensitivity and specificity were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72% to 89%) and 93% (95% CI 90% to 97%), respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 21.5 (95% CI 13.1 to 35.5) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.21), respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 67.8% (95% CI 57.6% to 78.0%) and 96.5% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), respectively. As expected, the per-patient analysis has shown an increased sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%) but a decreased specificity of 74% (95% CI 65% to 84%). CONCLUSIONS Multislice spiral computed tomography has shortcomings difficult to overcome in daily practice and, at the more clinically relevant per-patient analysis, continues to have moderate specificity in patients with high prevalence of CAD. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of the newest generation of MSCT, including patients with low to moderate CAD prevalence, will be critical in establishing the clinical role of this emerging technology as an alternative to CA.
引用
收藏
页码:1896 / 1910
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 64-SLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AS COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY: META-ANALYSIS OF MULTICENTER STUDIES
    Hamon, Michele
    Gueret, Pascal
    Laissy, Jean-Pierre
    Hamon, Martial
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E919 - E919
  • [2] Direct comparison between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography and conventional invasive coronary angiography.
    Ma, HS
    Lee, MKY
    Fu, CL
    Tam, LY
    Chan, MC
    Wong, WK
    Chan, MC
    Chan, S
    Yiu, SF
    Ho, KC
    Chiang, CS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (8A): : 19A - 19A
  • [3] The relationship between the coronary sinus and coronary artery using multislice spiral computed tomography and conventional invasive angiography
    Wei, Yidong
    Xie, Ping
    Pang, Wenyue
    Hu, Dayi
    Michaels, Andrew D.
    Sun, Yingxian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 137 (03) : 276 - 281
  • [4] Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Jiang, Wen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [5] Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography
    Schuijf, JD
    Bax, JJ
    Shaw, LJ
    de Roos, A
    Lamb, HJ
    van der Wall, EE
    Wijns, W
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (02) : 404 - 411
  • [6] Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography of the entire coronary tree
    Mollet, NR
    Cademartiri, F
    Nieman, K
    Saia, F
    Lemos, PA
    McFadden, EP
    Krestin, GP
    de Feyter, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 329A - 330A
  • [7] 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdulla, Jawdat
    Abildstrom, Steen Z.
    Gotzsche, Ole
    Christensen, Erik
    Kober, Lars
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (24) : 3042 - 3050
  • [8] The evaluation of the relationship between coronary sinus and coronary artery by using multislice spiral computed tomography and a comparison with conventional invasive angiography
    Wei, Yidong
    Hu, Dayi
    Sun, Yingxian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 122 : 59 - 59
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis
    Hamon, Michele
    Champ-Rigot, Laure
    Morello, Remy
    Riddell, John W.
    Hamon, Martial
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) : 217 - 225
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis
    Michèle Hamon
    Laure Champ-Rigot
    Rémy Morello
    John W. Riddell
    Martial Hamon
    [J]. European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 217 - 225