Utilization of Surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare Population - A Cohort Study

被引:8
|
作者
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris [1 ]
Fedewa, Stacey [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Chun Chieh [2 ]
Virgo, Katherine S. [4 ]
Jemal, Ahmedin [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Intramural Res Dept, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; COLONOSCOPY; POLYPS; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0110937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate time to surveillance and polyp recurrence rates for Medicare beneficiaries with a colonoscopy with polypectomy between 1998 and 2003 who were followed through 2008 for receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate risk factors for: 1) failing to undergo surveillance and 2) polyp recurrence among these individuals. Analyses were stratified into three 2-year cohorts based on baseline colonoscopy date. Results: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a colonoscopy with polypectomy in the 1998-1999 (n = 4,136), 2000-2001 (n = 3,538) and 2002-2003 (n = 4,655) cohorts had respective probabilities of 30%, 26% and 20% (p<0.001) of subsequent surveillance events within 3 years. At the same time, 58%, 52% and 45% (p<0.001) of beneficiaries received a surveillance event within 5 years. Polyp recurrence rates after 5 years were 36%, 30% and 26% (p<0.001) respectively. Older age (>= 70 years), female gender, later cohort (2000-2001 & 2002-2003), and severe comorbidity were the most important risk factors for failure to undergo a surveillance event. Male gender and early cohort (1998-1999) were the most important risk factors for polyp recurrence. Conclusions: Expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has not reduced underutilization of surveillance in the Medicare population. It is important to take action now to improve this situation, because polyp recurrence is substantial in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of BSG/ACPGBI/PHE polypectomy surveillance guidelines safely reduces the burden of surveillance in a screening cohort: a virtual model study
    Stack, Roisin
    Doherty, Jayne
    O'Morain, Neil
    Nolan, Blathnaid
    Sheridan, Juliette
    Cullen, Garret
    Mulcahy, Hugh
    Buckley, Maire
    Horgan, Gareth
    Hamed, Mohamed
    Mcdermott, Edel
    Doherty, Glen
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [32] Lichen sclerosus prevalence and clinical care in the medicare population: A cohort study
    Veerabagu, S. A.
    Li, Y.
    Grinsfelder, M.
    Little, A. J.
    Wehner, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 144 (08) : S39 - S39
  • [33] Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Robbins, Emma C.
    Pack, Kevin
    Stenson, Iain
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Veitch, Andrew M.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Wooldrage, Kate
    ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (10) : 948 - 958
  • [34] Surveillance for the management of small renal masses: Utilization and outcomes in a population-based cohort
    Huang, William C.
    Pinheiro, Laura C.
    Russo, Paul
    Lowrance, William Thomas
    Elkin, Elena B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (06)
  • [35] Utilization of Screening Mammograms in the Medicare Population Before and After the Affordable Care Act Implementation
    Bozzi, Laura M.
    Stuart, Bruce
    Onukwugha, Eberechukwu
    Tom, Sarah E.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2020, 32 (1-2) : 25 - 32
  • [36] Utilization of Surveillance Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus in Medicare Enrollees
    Rubenstein, Joel H.
    Noureldin, Mohamed
    Tavakkoli, Anna
    Hur, Chin
    Omidvari, Amir-Houshang
    Waljee, Akbar K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (03) : 773 - +
  • [37] IMPACT OF POST-POLYPECTOMY COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE ON COLORECTAL CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY: THE POST POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE (POPPSS) STUDY
    Gupta, Samir
    Demb, Joshua
    Earles, Ashley
    Yassin, Hanin
    Lamm, Mark
    Qin, Jiyue
    Doubeni, Chyke
    Shah, Shailja
    Kaltenbach, Tonya R.
    Gawron, Andrew J.
    Martinez, Maria Elena
    Messer, Karen
    Liu, Lin
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S44 - S45
  • [38] Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy may be extended to 7 years
    Miller, Hannah L.
    Mukherjee, Rupa
    Tian, Jianmin
    Nagar, Anil B.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A162 - A162
  • [39] PERSONALIZED SURVEILLANCE AFTER POLYPECTOMY GUIDED BY FAECAL HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION
    Hsu, ChenYang
    Hsu, Wen-Feng
    Su, Chiu-Wen
    Chuang, Mark Pi-Chun
    Chen, Sam L.
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S162 - S163
  • [40] Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe: Surveillance after polypectomy or CRC resection
    Froehlich, Florian
    Arditi, Chantal
    Gonvers, Jean-Jacques
    Burnand, Bernard
    Vader, John-Paul
    Filliettaz, Severine Schussele
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    Pittet, Valerie
    Juillerat, Pascal
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (35-36) : 17S - 17S