Utilization of Surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare Population - A Cohort Study

被引:8
|
作者
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris [1 ]
Fedewa, Stacey [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Chun Chieh [2 ]
Virgo, Katherine S. [4 ]
Jemal, Ahmedin [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Intramural Res Dept, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; COLONOSCOPY; POLYPS; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0110937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate time to surveillance and polyp recurrence rates for Medicare beneficiaries with a colonoscopy with polypectomy between 1998 and 2003 who were followed through 2008 for receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate risk factors for: 1) failing to undergo surveillance and 2) polyp recurrence among these individuals. Analyses were stratified into three 2-year cohorts based on baseline colonoscopy date. Results: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a colonoscopy with polypectomy in the 1998-1999 (n = 4,136), 2000-2001 (n = 3,538) and 2002-2003 (n = 4,655) cohorts had respective probabilities of 30%, 26% and 20% (p<0.001) of subsequent surveillance events within 3 years. At the same time, 58%, 52% and 45% (p<0.001) of beneficiaries received a surveillance event within 5 years. Polyp recurrence rates after 5 years were 36%, 30% and 26% (p<0.001) respectively. Older age (>= 70 years), female gender, later cohort (2000-2001 & 2002-2003), and severe comorbidity were the most important risk factors for failure to undergo a surveillance event. Male gender and early cohort (1998-1999) were the most important risk factors for polyp recurrence. Conclusions: Expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has not reduced underutilization of surveillance in the Medicare population. It is important to take action now to improve this situation, because polyp recurrence is substantial in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrospective cohort study on the symptomatic recurrence pattern after hysteroscopic polypectomy
    Cea Garcia, Jorge
    Jimenez Caraballo, Antonio
    Rios Vallejo, MarIa del Mar
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2020, 9 (04): : 209 - 214
  • [22] Incidence and treatments of actinic keratosis in the Medicare population: A cohort study
    Navsaria, L.
    Li, Y.
    Nowakowska, M. K.
    Hinkston, C.
    Wheless, L.
    Giordano, S.
    Wehner, M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (08) : B10 - B10
  • [23] Follow up Practices After Colonoscopy With Polypectomy in Medicare Beneficiaries
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Kou, Tzuyung D.
    Koroukian, Siran
    Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill
    Schluchter, Mark
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S24 - S24
  • [24] Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Robbins, Emma C.
    Pack, Kevin
    Stenson, Iain
    Patel, Bhavita
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Veitch, Andrew M.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Wooldrage, Kate
    GUT, 2021, 70 (12) : 2307 - 2320
  • [25] Guidelines for surveillance intervals after polypectomy: Coping with the evidence
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (06) : 477 - 479
  • [26] Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and colorectal cancer resection
    Brooks, Durado D.
    Winawer, Sidney J.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Smith, Robert A.
    Levin, Bernard
    Wender, Richard
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2008, 77 (07) : 995 - 1002
  • [27] Predicting adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after polypectomy
    Rawl, SM
    Blackburn, S
    Hackward, L
    Fineberg, NS
    Imperiale, T
    Rahmani, E
    Rex, D
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A602 - A602
  • [28] Surveillance Colonoscopy after Polypectomy: Actual Practice in Korea
    Kim, Kyeong Ok
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2014, 12 (01) : 83 - 84
  • [29] FAECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS (FIT) FOR SURVEILLANCE AFTER SCREENING AND POLYPECTOMY: AN ACCURACY AND EFFICIENCY STUDY
    Robbins, Emma
    Wooldrage, Kate
    MacRae, Eilidh
    Stenson, Iain
    Patel, Bhavita
    Pack, Kevin
    Piggott, Carolyn
    Pearson, Sheena
    Snowball, Julia
    Duffy, Stephen
    Halloran, Stephen
    Atkin, Wendy
    Cross, Amanda
    GUT, 2018, 67 : A222 - A222
  • [30] Effective utilization of polypectomy in endoscopic salvage treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study
    Ju, Yeonuk
    Bong, Jun Woo
    Cheong, Chinock
    Kang, Sanghee
    Min, Byung wook
    Lee, Sun Il
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2024, 107 (03) : 151 - 157