Spatial vulnerability assessment of anchor damage within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Australia

被引:20
|
作者
Kininmonth, Stuart [1 ,2 ]
Lemm, Stephanie [1 ]
Malone, Cherie [1 ]
Hatley, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Great Barrier Reef Marine Pk Author, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; CORAL-REEF; POSIDONIA-OCEANICA; RESILIENCE; IMPACTS; RECOVERY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.003
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The coral reefs and seagrass habitats in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA) are vulnerable to physical disturbances, including the anchoring of vessels. Both the anchor being deployed and retrieved, as well as the movement of the attaching rode, can cause damage to corals and seagrasses. Understanding the contributing processes that influence the deployment of anchors can assist with managing anchor damage in the GBRWHA, particularly in the context of climate change. Providing a spatial description of the vulnerability, rather than just a list of factors, requires the incorporation of social, geophysical and ecological factors. An integrated GIS-Bayesian Belief Network was utilised to combine 19 spatial datasets, 6 spatial models and expert opinion. The base scale was set to match the 250 m lattice interval of the Great Barrier Reef digital elevation model. With approximately 5 million data points the model was able to spatially describe the likelihood of damage from anchor deployment across the GBRWHA. While only 19% of the GBRWHA is considered susceptible to anchor damage, the assessment indicates that coral reefs and seagrass meadows adjacent to population centres and in particular close to islands are highly vulnerable. Comparisons with coral reef health surveys (Eye on the Reef Program) and detailed anchorage records from a scientific research vessel indicate the model is robust despite extensive use of disparate spatial data and expert opinion. The effect of each node in the Bayesian Belief Network on the anchor vulnerability beliefs was measured by standard variance reduction and this found that anchor site familiarity and accessibility were the dominant influences aside from the presence of sensitive habitat. Visualisation of the model outputs, including the intermediate stages, provided additional qualitative evaluation. Enhancing the vulnerability assessment to describe every location in the GBRWHA will contribute to the development of policy and governance mechanisms whilst supporting focused monitoring of sites vulnerable to anchor damage. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 31
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive management of the great barrier reef and the Grand Canyon world heritage areas
    Hughes, Terence P.
    Gunderson, Lance H.
    Folke, Carl
    Baird, Andrew H.
    Bellwood, David
    Berkes, Fikret
    Crona, Beatrice
    Helfgott, Ariella
    Leslie, Heather
    Norberg, Jon
    Nystrom, Magnus
    Olsson, Per
    Osterblom, Henrik
    Scheffer, Marten
    Schuttenberg, Heidi
    Steneck, Robert S.
    Tengoe, Maria
    Troll, Max
    Walker, Brian
    Wilson, James
    Worm, Boris
    AMBIO, 2007, 36 (07) : 586 - 592
  • [32] Phosphorus fertility assessment of intensively farmed areas of catchments draining to the great barrier reef world heritage area; 1: Soil phosphorus status
    Rayment, George E.
    Bloesch, Philip M.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2006, 37 (15-20) : 2249 - 2264
  • [33] Managing threats and restoring wetlands within catchments of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Adame, Maria Fernanda
    Arthington, Angela H.
    Waltham, Nathan
    Hasan, Syezlin
    Selles, Amelia
    Ronan, Mike
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (05) : 829 - 839
  • [34] Valuing beach recreation across a regional area: The Great Barrier Reef in Australia
    Rolfe, John
    Gregg, Daniel
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 69 : 282 - 290
  • [35] Water quality in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Past perspectives, current issues and new research directions
    Haynes, D
    Michalek-Wagner, K
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2000, 41 (7-12) : 428 - 434
  • [36] Expanding coastal urban and industrial seascape in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Critical need for coordinated planning and policy
    Waltham, Nathan J.
    Sheaves, Marcus
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 57 : 78 - 84
  • [37] Evaluating management initiatives aimed at reducing the mortality of dugongs in gill and mesh nets in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
    Marsh, H
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 16 (03) : 684 - 694
  • [38] ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE RECONNAISSANCE OF MUDS FROM GREAT BARRIER REEF AREA, AUSTRALIA
    FOLK, RL
    SEARCH, 1972, 3 (05): : 171 - &
  • [39] Spatial variation in the effects of grazing on epilithic algal turfs on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    R. M. Bonaldo
    D. R. Bellwood
    Coral Reefs, 2011, 30 : 381 - 390
  • [40] Spatial variation in the effects of grazing on epilithic algal turfs on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Bonaldo, R. M.
    Bellwood, D. R.
    CORAL REEFS, 2011, 30 (02) : 381 - 390