Spatial vulnerability assessment of anchor damage within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Australia

被引:20
|
作者
Kininmonth, Stuart [1 ,2 ]
Lemm, Stephanie [1 ]
Malone, Cherie [1 ]
Hatley, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Great Barrier Reef Marine Pk Author, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; CORAL-REEF; POSIDONIA-OCEANICA; RESILIENCE; IMPACTS; RECOVERY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.003
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The coral reefs and seagrass habitats in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA) are vulnerable to physical disturbances, including the anchoring of vessels. Both the anchor being deployed and retrieved, as well as the movement of the attaching rode, can cause damage to corals and seagrasses. Understanding the contributing processes that influence the deployment of anchors can assist with managing anchor damage in the GBRWHA, particularly in the context of climate change. Providing a spatial description of the vulnerability, rather than just a list of factors, requires the incorporation of social, geophysical and ecological factors. An integrated GIS-Bayesian Belief Network was utilised to combine 19 spatial datasets, 6 spatial models and expert opinion. The base scale was set to match the 250 m lattice interval of the Great Barrier Reef digital elevation model. With approximately 5 million data points the model was able to spatially describe the likelihood of damage from anchor deployment across the GBRWHA. While only 19% of the GBRWHA is considered susceptible to anchor damage, the assessment indicates that coral reefs and seagrass meadows adjacent to population centres and in particular close to islands are highly vulnerable. Comparisons with coral reef health surveys (Eye on the Reef Program) and detailed anchorage records from a scientific research vessel indicate the model is robust despite extensive use of disparate spatial data and expert opinion. The effect of each node in the Bayesian Belief Network on the anchor vulnerability beliefs was measured by standard variance reduction and this found that anchor site familiarity and accessibility were the dominant influences aside from the presence of sensitive habitat. Visualisation of the model outputs, including the intermediate stages, provided additional qualitative evaluation. Enhancing the vulnerability assessment to describe every location in the GBRWHA will contribute to the development of policy and governance mechanisms whilst supporting focused monitoring of sites vulnerable to anchor damage. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 31
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water quality guidelines for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: a basis for development and preliminary values
    Moss, A
    Brodie, J
    Furnas, M
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 51 (1-4) : 76 - 88
  • [22] Rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: does it afford greater protection for marine turtles?
    Dryden, Jennifer
    Grech, Alana
    Moloney, James
    Hamann, Mark
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (05) : 477 - 485
  • [23] Great Barrier Reef still a World Heritage Site-for now
    Nutt, David
    SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) : 1064 - 1064
  • [24] Assessment of the eutrophication status of the Great Barrier Reef lagoon (Australia)
    J. E. Brodie
    M. Devlin
    D. Haynes
    J. Waterhouse
    Biogeochemistry, 2011, 106 : 281 - 302
  • [25] Assessment of the eutrophication status of the Great Barrier Reef lagoon (Australia)
    Brodie, J. E.
    Devlin, M.
    Haynes, D.
    Waterhouse, J.
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 106 (02) : 281 - 302
  • [26] An integrated risk assessment for climate change: analysing the vulnerability of sharks and rays on Australia's Great Barrier Reef
    Chin, Andrew
    Kyne, Peter M.
    Walker, Terence I.
    Mcauley, Rory B.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (07) : 1936 - 1953
  • [27] Pesticide and herbicide residues in sediments and seagrasses from the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area and Queensland coast
    Haynes, D
    Müller, J
    Carter, S
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2000, 41 (7-12) : 279 - 287
  • [28] The influence of a season of extreme wet weather events on exposure of the World Heritage Area Great Barrier Reef to pesticides
    Kennedy, Karen
    Devlin, Michelle
    Bentley, Christie
    Lee-Chue, Kristie
    Paxman, Chris
    Carter, Steve
    Lewis, Stephen E.
    Brodie, Jon
    Guy, Ellia
    Vardy, Suzanne
    Martin, Katherine C.
    Jones, Alison
    Packett, Robert
    Mueller, Jochen F.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2012, 64 (07) : 1495 - 1507
  • [29] The 25 Year Strategic Plan for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: A model for strategic planning in the Wadden Sea Area?
    Cansfield-Smith T.
    Senckenbergiana maritima, 1998, 29 (1-6): : 165 - 171
  • [30] The significance of environmental values for destination competitiveness and sustainable tourism strategy making: insights from Australia's Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
    Esparon, Michelle
    Stoeckl, Natalie
    Farr, Marina
    Larson, Silva
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2015, 23 (05) : 706 - 725