Efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a biphasic, truncated exponential shock waveform at variable initial shock energies

被引:16
|
作者
Rashba, EJ
Gold, MR
Crawford, FA
Leman, RB
Peters, RW
Shorofsky, SR
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2004年 / 94卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Biphasic shocks are more effective than damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion (CV) of atria[ fibrillation (AF), but the optimal protocol for CV with biphasic shocks has not been defined. We conducted a prospective, randomized study of 120 consecutive patients with persistent AF to delineate the dose-response curve for CV of AF with a biphasic truncated exponential shock waveform and to identify clinical predictors of shock efficacy. Our data suggest that the initial shock energy for CV with this waveform should be 200 1 if the patient weighs <90 kg and 360 J if the patient weighs >= 90 kg. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1574
页数:3
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] A comparison of the efficacy of initial high energy versus initial low energy biphasic shocks for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter - a real-life experience
    Venkataramanan, Sai Vikram Alampoondi
    Vunnam, Ramarao
    Voruganti, Dinesh
    Tsai, Shane
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [42] Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation - The results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial
    Page, RL
    Kerber, RE
    Russell, JK
    Trouton, T
    Waktare, J
    Gallik, D
    Olgin, JE
    Ricard, P
    Dalzell, GW
    Reddy, R
    Lazzara, R
    Lee, K
    Carlson, M
    Halperin, B
    Bardy, GH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (12) : 1956 - 1963
  • [43] Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic indices predictive of sinus rhythm maintenance after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: An echocardiographic study during direct current shock
    De Piccoli, B
    Rigo, F
    Ragazzo, M
    Zuin, G
    Martino, A
    Raviele, A
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2001, 18 (07): : 545 - 552
  • [44] Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation; Initial and Subsequent Change in Transthoracic Impedance Predicts the Likelihood to Require Charge Escalation to High Energies During External Defibrillation
    Mohammedzein, Assad
    Walsh, Katie
    Abubakr, Abushama
    Owens, Patrick
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [45] External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application
    Manegold, Johannes C.
    Israel, Carsten W.
    Ehrlich, Joachim R.
    Duray, Gabor
    Pajitney, Dmitri
    Wegener, Florian T.
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (14) : 1731 - 1738
  • [46] Biphasic vs monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: The results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.
    Page, RL
    Kerber, RE
    Russell, JK
    Trouton, TG
    Waktare, J
    Olgin, JE
    Gallik, DM
    Ricard, P
    Lazzara, R
    Carlson, MD
    Lee, KL
    Bardy, GH
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 574 - 574
  • [47] A pilot study of a low-tilt biphasic waveform for transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Improved efficacy compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in patients
    Glover, Benedict M.
    McCann, Conor J.
    Manoharan, Ganesh
    Walsh, Simon J.
    Moore, Michael J.
    Allen, James D.
    Escalona, Omar
    Anderson, John Mcc.
    Trouton, Tom G.
    Stevenson, Mike
    Roberts, Michael J.
    Adgey, Jennifer AA.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (08): : 1020 - 1024