Efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a biphasic, truncated exponential shock waveform at variable initial shock energies

被引:16
|
作者
Rashba, EJ
Gold, MR
Crawford, FA
Leman, RB
Peters, RW
Shorofsky, SR
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2004年 / 94卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Biphasic shocks are more effective than damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion (CV) of atria[ fibrillation (AF), but the optimal protocol for CV with biphasic shocks has not been defined. We conducted a prospective, randomized study of 120 consecutive patients with persistent AF to delineate the dose-response curve for CV of AF with a biphasic truncated exponential shock waveform and to identify clinical predictors of shock efficacy. Our data suggest that the initial shock energy for CV with this waveform should be 200 1 if the patient weighs <90 kg and 360 J if the patient weighs >= 90 kg. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1574
页数:3
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Distribution of successful shock energies using a biphasic waveform in a pig model of spontaneous ischemic ventricular fibrillation
    Walcott, GP
    Killingsworth, CR
    Taylor, JW
    Smith, WM
    Ideker, RE
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 90 - 91
  • [32] A comparison of rectilinear and truncated exponential biphasic waveforms in elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Connelly, Stephanie
    Wharton, Rupert
    Yuen, Ho Ming
    RESUSCITATION, 2013, 84 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [33] Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
    Khaykin, Y
    Newman, D
    Kowalewski, M
    Korley, V
    Dorian, P
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (08) : 868 - 872
  • [34] A prospective, randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: shock efficacy and post-procedure pain
    Chapman, FW
    Dorian, P
    Koster, RW
    Schmitt, PW
    O'Grady, SG
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 132 - 132
  • [35] Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a novel biphasic waveform from a radiofrequency powered defibrillator
    Glover, BM
    Roberts, MJ
    Anderson, JM
    Adgey, AAJ
    HEART, 2006, 92 : A18 - A18
  • [36] Personalizing configuration for atrial fibrillation external electrical cardioversion to improve first shock efficacy
    Massaro, Giulia
    Spagni, Stefano
    Martignani, Cristian
    Bettazzoni, Luca
    Spadotto, Alberto
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Biffi, Mauro
    Galie, Nazzareno
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Frisoni, Jessica
    Diemberger, Igor
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (10) : 655 - 662
  • [37] Monophasic and biphasic shock for transthoracic conversion of atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Secorun Inacio, Jose Francisco
    Gomes da Rosa, Michele dos Santos
    Shah, Julie
    Rosario, Jeferson
    Nickenig Vissoci, Joao Ricardo
    Langer Manica, Andre Luiz
    Rodrigues, Clarissa Garcia
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 100 : 66 - 75
  • [38] Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Manoharan, G
    Evans, N
    Allen, D
    Anderson, J
    Adgey, J
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (13) : 1686 - 1692
  • [39] External Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in young and old patients: Results of a randomized trial comparing biphasic and monophasic shock
    Fumagalli, S
    Boncinelli, L
    Boni, N
    Padeletti, M
    Franceschini, C
    Valoti, P
    Baldereschi, G
    Marchionni, N
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 318 - 318
  • [40] Determinants of muscular damage with external Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Results of a randomized trial comparing biphasic with monophasic shock
    Fumagalli, S
    Boncinelli, L
    Boni, N
    Padeletti, M
    Virgillo, A
    Franceschini, C
    Aglietti, M
    Marchionni, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 139A - 139A