Environmental and Energy-Efficiency Considerations for Selecting Building Envelopes

被引:3
|
作者
Zaborova, Daria [1 ]
Musorina, Tatiana [1 ]
机构
[1] Peter Great St Petersburg Polytech Univ, Inst Civil Engn, Polytech Skaya 29, St Petersburg 195251, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
building materials; building construction; energy-efficiency; carbon dioxide emissions; manufacturer EPD; life cycle assessment; embodied energy; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su14105914
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessments in the construction industry reveal that 70-80% of all CO2 emissions occur precisely at the stage of material production (stages A1-A3 of the life cycle). Therefore, not only does the strength and thermal properties of the material selected for construction have major importance, but also the environmental impact of the material and the amount of energy spent to extract, manufacture and transport the materials. The paper presents the thermal calculations for envelope structures, assessing their environmental impact with respect to three parameters: carbon dioxide emissions, total energy consumption and amount of waste generated during material production. The research method used was an analysis of documents from real manufacturers and calculations of the main environmental parameters. Our investigation has led us to conclude that the largest amount of carbon dioxide emissions is produced by structures containing reinforced concrete, since the weight fraction of concrete is significantly greater than that of all other compared materials. The largest amount of non-renewable energy is consumed by structures containing clay bricks and reinforced concrete, since they consist of natural sources. The largest amount of waste is generated by structures containing expanded polystyrene and reinforced concrete consisting of cement, whose production in turn generates a large amount of waste.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of building energy and environmental assessment in facilitating office building energy-efficiency
    Osaji, Emeka E.
    Suresh, Subashini
    Chinyio, Ezekiel
    [J]. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 2013, 22 : 679 - 704
  • [2] Energy-Efficiency Requirements for Residential Building Envelopes in Cold-Climate Regions
    Huynh, Amy
    Dias Barkokebas, Regina
    Al-Hussein, Mohamed
    Cruz-Noguez, Carlos
    Chen, Yuxiang
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (03)
  • [3] Energy Efficiency of Building Envelopes
    Jedinak, Richard
    [J]. ADVANCED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS 2013, 2014, 855 : 39 - 42
  • [4] Design of controllable energy-efficiency Building
    [J]. 2001, Huazhong Jianzhu (19):
  • [5] Energy-efficiency grants, green building education
    Colker, Ryan M.
    [J]. ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (11) : 14 - 14
  • [6] Energy-efficiency building retrofit planning for green building compliance
    Fan, Yuling
    Xia, Xiaohua
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 136 : 312 - 321
  • [7] The Strategies of Passive Energy-efficiency Design in Low Energy Building
    Wang Xinbin
    Liu Jiaping
    Fu Yu
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 368-370 : 1318 - +
  • [8] THE INTERSECTION OF ENERGY-EFFICIENCY, COST AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
    Alipour, Mehrdad
    Patadiya, Harikrishna
    [J]. ASHRAE Journal, 2023, 65 (10) : 22 - 24
  • [9] Experimental Evaluation of Energy-Efficiency in a Holistically Designed Building
    Buzatu, Raluca
    Ungureanu, Viorel
    Ciutina, Adrian
    Gireada, Mihaita
    Vitan, Daniel
    Petran, Ioan
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [10] A Dissipating Frames for Seismic Retrofitting and Building Energy-Efficiency
    Foti, Dora
    Ruggiero, Francesco
    Sabba, Maria Francesca
    Lerna, Michela
    [J]. INFRASTRUCTURES, 2020, 5 (09)