Environmental and Energy-Efficiency Considerations for Selecting Building Envelopes

被引:3
|
作者
Zaborova, Daria [1 ]
Musorina, Tatiana [1 ]
机构
[1] Peter Great St Petersburg Polytech Univ, Inst Civil Engn, Polytech Skaya 29, St Petersburg 195251, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
building materials; building construction; energy-efficiency; carbon dioxide emissions; manufacturer EPD; life cycle assessment; embodied energy; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su14105914
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessments in the construction industry reveal that 70-80% of all CO2 emissions occur precisely at the stage of material production (stages A1-A3 of the life cycle). Therefore, not only does the strength and thermal properties of the material selected for construction have major importance, but also the environmental impact of the material and the amount of energy spent to extract, manufacture and transport the materials. The paper presents the thermal calculations for envelope structures, assessing their environmental impact with respect to three parameters: carbon dioxide emissions, total energy consumption and amount of waste generated during material production. The research method used was an analysis of documents from real manufacturers and calculations of the main environmental parameters. Our investigation has led us to conclude that the largest amount of carbon dioxide emissions is produced by structures containing reinforced concrete, since the weight fraction of concrete is significantly greater than that of all other compared materials. The largest amount of non-renewable energy is consumed by structures containing clay bricks and reinforced concrete, since they consist of natural sources. The largest amount of waste is generated by structures containing expanded polystyrene and reinforced concrete consisting of cement, whose production in turn generates a large amount of waste.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes
    Azari, Rahman
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 : 156 - 162
  • [32] ENERGY JUSTICE Barriers to energy-efficiency
    Richler, Jenn
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (05): : 356 - 356
  • [33] Energy-efficiency: Issues for the decade
    Hollander, JM
    Schneider, TR
    [J]. ENERGY, 1996, 21 (04) : 273 - 287
  • [34] Federal energy-efficiency programs
    [J]. 2001, American Chemical Society (79):
  • [35] Energy-efficiency: the future of wasteate
    不详
    [J]. FILTRATION & SEPARATION, 2007, 44 (07): : 42 - 44
  • [36] Energy-efficiency and costs in focus
    不详
    [J]. BWK, 2005, 57 (04): : 6 - 6
  • [37] Automated Energy-Efficiency Evaluation
    Junge, Mark
    Martin, Lars
    [J]. BWK, 2012, 64 (03): : 7 - 9
  • [38] Home Energy-Efficiency Retrofits
    Stephens, Brent
    Carter, Ellison M.
    Gall, Elliott T.
    Earnest, C. Matt
    Walsh, Elizabeth A.
    Hun, Diana E.
    Jackson, Mark C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 119 (07) : A283 - A284
  • [39] Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap
    Gerarden, Todd D.
    Newell, Richard G.
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2017, 55 (04) : 1486 - 1525
  • [40] High energy-efficiency buildings
    Zambelli, E
    Imperadori, M
    Masera, G
    Lemma, M
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 632 - 638