Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework

被引:597
|
作者
Lam, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Canterbury Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7PE, Kent, England
关键词
tacit knowledge; organizational learning; innovation; societal institutions; learning economy;
D O I
10.1177/0170840600213001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The importance of tacit knowledge in organizational learning and innovation has become the focus Of considerable attention in the recent literature. Our understanding of the nature of the links between tacit knowledge and organizational learning, however, has been hampered by the lack of a conceptual framework integrating micro-level learning activities with organizational forms and macro-level societal institutions. This paper seeks to achieve such an integrative task. It argues that there is an interactive relationship between dominant knowledge types and organizational forms. Further, the extent to which tacit knowledge constitutes the knowledge base of the firm, and how it is formed and used are powerfully shaped by the broader institutional context. The paper develops a four-fold typology at the cognitive, organizational and societal levels, as an analytical framework to explain the links between knowledge types, organizational forms and societal institutions. It shows how the three levels interact to shape the learning and innovative capabilities of firms. The theory developed in this paper represents the first attempt to integrate the diverse strands of literature and different levels of analysis into a single coherent framework.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 513
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An integrated model of marketing knowledge - a tacit knowledge perspective
    Zebal, Mostaque
    Ferdous, Ahmed
    Chambers, Colin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2019, 21 (01) : 2 - 18
  • [22] Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory
    Nonaka, Ikujiro
    von Krogh, Georg
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (03) : 635 - 652
  • [23] The Organizational Value of Tacit Knowledge Derived from Parenting
    Rimbau-Gilabert, Eva
    Miyar-Cruz, David
    Maria Lopez-de Pedro, Jose
    [J]. OPEN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: A COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANIFESTO, 2008, 19 : 371 - +
  • [24] Tacit vs explicit knowledge as antecedents for organizational change
    Gamble, Jordan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (06) : 1123 - 1141
  • [25] Mystery of the unknown: revisiting tacit knowledge in the organizational literature
    Oguz, Fuat
    Sengun, Ayse Elif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 15 (03) : 445 - 461
  • [26] Leadership transitions, tacit knowledge sharing and organizational generativity
    Peet, Melissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 16 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [27] The tacit knowledge from the perspective of different organizational positions
    Vadi, Maaja
    Vereshagin, Michael
    [J]. ISMOT'07: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology, Vols 1 and 2: MANAGING TOTAL INNOVATION AND OPEN INNOVATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2007, : 570 - 573
  • [28] ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR - AN INSTRUMENT FOR SHARING TACIT KNOWLEDGE
    Arustei , Carmen Claudia
    Leon, Ramona-Diana
    [J]. BUSINESS EXCELLENCE CHALLENGES DURING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS, VOL 1, 2012, : 20 - 25
  • [29] The Influence of Technology Slack and Tacit Knowledge in the Capability of Organizational Learning in Hospital-In-the-Home Units
    Salmador Sanchez, Paz
    Cegarra Navarro, Juan Gabriel
    Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel
    Martinez Caro, Eva
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 1041 - 1045
  • [30] LEVERAGING TACIT KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER WITHIN ONLINE LEARNING SYSTEMS WITH THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE OBJECTS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
    Ketcha, Annel
    Johannesson, Jokull
    Bocij, Paul
    [J]. EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 2911 - 2918