Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening

被引:29
|
作者
Joseph, Djenaba A. [1 ]
Redwood, Diana [2 ]
DeGroff, Amy [1 ]
Butler, Emily L. [3 ]
机构
[1] CDC, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Alaska Native Tribal Hlth Consortium, Alaska Native Epidemiol Ctr, Anchorage, AK USA
[3] Washington State Dept Hlth, Breast Cerv & Colon Hlth Program, Tumwater, WA USA
关键词
CONTROL PROGRAM GRANTEES; PATIENT NAVIGATION; STATE;
D O I
10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers that affect both men and women. Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness, CRC screening tests are underused. Racial/ethnic minority groups, persons without insurance, those with lower educational attainment, and those with lower household income levels have lower rates of CRC screening. Since 2009, CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) has supported state health departments and tribal organizations in implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase use of CRC screening tests among their populations. This report highlights the successful implementation of EBIs to address disparities by two CRCCP grantees: the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and Washington State's Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program (BCCHP). ANTHC partnered with regional tribal health organizations in the Alaska Tribal Health System to implement provider and client reminders and use patient navigators to increase CRC screening rates among Alaska Native populations. BCCHP identified patient care coordinators in each clinic who coordinated staff training on CRC screening and integrated client and provider reminder systems. In both the Alaska and Washington programs, instituting provider reminder systems, client reminder systems, or both was facilitated by use of electronic health record systems. Using multicomponent interventions in a single clinical site or facility can support more organized screening programs and potentially result in greater increases in screening rates than relying on a single strategy. Organized screening systems have an explicit policy for screening, a defined target population, a team responsible for implementation of the screening program, and a quality assurance structure. Although CRC screening rates in the United States have increased steadily over the past decade, this increase has not been seen equally across all populations. Increasing the use of EBIs, such as those described in this report, in health care clinics and systems that serve populations with lower CRC screening rates could substantially increase CRC screening rates.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using Evidence-Based Internet Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities Worldwide
    Munoz, Ricardo F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (05) : e60p.1 - e60p.9
  • [42] Screening and Evidence-Based Interventions for Distress in Patients With Cancer: Nurses Must Lead the Way
    Brown, Carlton G.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 (01) : 23 - 25
  • [43] Strategies and Resources to Address Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates and Disparities in the United States and Globally
    Potter, Michael B.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 34, 2013, 34 : 413 - 429
  • [44] Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Chemotherapy Strategies
    Grennan, Tim
    [J]. PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 32 (01) : 48 - 50
  • [45] Evidence-based information for public health policy: The Colorectal Cancer Screening example.
    Coombs, AB
    Jones-McLean, E
    Bouchard, F
    White, K
    Berthelot, JM
    Le Petit, C
    Flanagan, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : S38 - S38
  • [46] Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use
    Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu
    Kim, Jungyoon
    LaCrete, Frantzlee
    Samson, Kaeli
    Foster, Jason
    Farazi, Paraskevi A.
    LeVan, Tricia
    Napit, Krishtee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2022, 38 (04): : 845 - 854
  • [47] Community-based screening interventions for colorectal cancer
    Douglas, CY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (3-4) : 133 - 146
  • [48] Implementing evidence-based interventions (EBI) to increase uptake of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Vulnerable Populations
    Jones, Beth A.
    Suttiratana, Sakinah C.
    DeGiovanni, Sally A.
    Robinson, Levita Y.
    Couturie, Michael J.
    Stevens, Denise
    Stefanou, Monique K.
    DeJesus, Jose
    Reyes, Eduardo
    Colon, Jonathan
    Cosgrove, Maryanne
    Parra, Steven J.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [49] Community-based colorectal cancer screening initiative to address colorectal cancer disparities among African Americans and sexual and gender minorities on the Southside of Chicago
    Watson, Karriem S.
    Henderson, Vida
    Madrigal, Jessica
    Gonzalez, Jeanette
    Martinez, Erica
    Mannan, Nasima
    Roberson, Tonya
    Murray, Marcus
    Tossas-Milligna, Katherine
    Winn, Robert A.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (06)
  • [50] Breast Cancer Screening An Evidence-Based Update
    Fuller, Mackenzie S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 99 (03) : 451 - +