Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening

被引:29
|
作者
Joseph, Djenaba A. [1 ]
Redwood, Diana [2 ]
DeGroff, Amy [1 ]
Butler, Emily L. [3 ]
机构
[1] CDC, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Alaska Native Tribal Hlth Consortium, Alaska Native Epidemiol Ctr, Anchorage, AK USA
[3] Washington State Dept Hlth, Breast Cerv & Colon Hlth Program, Tumwater, WA USA
关键词
CONTROL PROGRAM GRANTEES; PATIENT NAVIGATION; STATE;
D O I
10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers that affect both men and women. Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness, CRC screening tests are underused. Racial/ethnic minority groups, persons without insurance, those with lower educational attainment, and those with lower household income levels have lower rates of CRC screening. Since 2009, CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) has supported state health departments and tribal organizations in implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase use of CRC screening tests among their populations. This report highlights the successful implementation of EBIs to address disparities by two CRCCP grantees: the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and Washington State's Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program (BCCHP). ANTHC partnered with regional tribal health organizations in the Alaska Tribal Health System to implement provider and client reminders and use patient navigators to increase CRC screening rates among Alaska Native populations. BCCHP identified patient care coordinators in each clinic who coordinated staff training on CRC screening and integrated client and provider reminder systems. In both the Alaska and Washington programs, instituting provider reminder systems, client reminder systems, or both was facilitated by use of electronic health record systems. Using multicomponent interventions in a single clinical site or facility can support more organized screening programs and potentially result in greater increases in screening rates than relying on a single strategy. Organized screening systems have an explicit policy for screening, a defined target population, a team responsible for implementation of the screening program, and a quality assurance structure. Although CRC screening rates in the United States have increased steadily over the past decade, this increase has not been seen equally across all populations. Increasing the use of EBIs, such as those described in this report, in health care clinics and systems that serve populations with lower CRC screening rates could substantially increase CRC screening rates.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program
    Omelu, Ndukaku
    Kempster, Marilyn
    Velasquez, Leeann
    de Ybarra, Jessica Nunez
    Littaua, Renato
    Davis-Patterson, Shauntay
    Coelho, Marco
    Darsie, Brendan
    Hunter, June
    Donahue, Celena
    Carrillo, Socorro
    Arias, Raquel
    Pinal, Sonia
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2024, 31
  • [32] Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Sterpetti, Antonio V.
    Gabriele, Raimondo
    Iannone, Immacolata
    Dimarzo, Luca
    Borrelli, Valeria
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 4560 - 4562
  • [33] Enhancing partnerships to address cancer screening disparities: community engagement strategies in a colorectal cancer screening navigation trial
    Escaron, Anne
    Garcia, Joanna
    Aranda, Adriana
    Macias-Sandoval, Jacqueline
    Quintanilla, Dina Cruz
    Gomez, Crystal
    Arredondo, Elva
    Coronado, Gloria
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (09)
  • [34] Reach of digital interventions to address disparities in repeat lung cancer screening in Washington State
    Vasavada, Anjali
    Palazzo, Lorella
    Triplette, Matthew
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Anderson, Melissa
    Luce, Casey
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Ralston, James
    Rogers, Kristine
    Bezman, Nadia
    Green, Beverly B.
    Carter-Bawa, Lisa
    Wernli, Karen J.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (09)
  • [35] Sex-based Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Yager, Sarah S.
    Chen, Leo
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (06): : 555 - 560
  • [36] Disparities in Endoscopy Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States
    Andrew J. Gawron
    Rena Yadlapati
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 530 - 537
  • [37] Disparities in Endoscopy Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States
    Gawron, Andrew J.
    Yadlapati, Rena
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (03) : 530 - 537
  • [38] Cancer screening: Understanding barriers to optimal use of evidence-based strategies
    Markman, Maurie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 16 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [39] Sociobehavioral interventions that address multiple behaviors - good idea or evidence-based?
    Oldenburg, B.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2006, 21 : 113 - 113
  • [40] Evidence-Based Yoga Interventions for Patients With Cancer
    Sisk, Angela
    Fonteyn, Marsha
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (02) : 181 - 186