Roughness analysis of general-shape particles, from 2D closed outlines to 3D closed surfaces

被引:25
|
作者
Su, Dong [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Xiang [2 ]
Yang, Hong-Wei [3 ]
Hong, Chengyu [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geol Mineral & Geophys, Bochum, Germany
[4] Shenzhen Univ, Underground Polis Acad, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Roughness; General-shape particles; Fourier series; Spherical harmonic analyses; Benchmark surface; X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTAL DIMENSION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RANDOM-FIELDS; ANGULARITY; SPHERICITY; ROUNDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.042
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Surface roughness plays an important role in macro and micro-scale granular behaviors; however, there is currently lack of a unified approach to quantify the roughness of closed outlines and surfaces, which can consider the overall morphological characteristics of particles. This paper proposes approaches that are suitable for roughness evaluation of 2D general-shape closed outlines and 3D general-shape closed surfaces. For 2D closed outlines, the roughness is evaluated by comparing the real outline with the benchmark outline reconstructed based on the Fourier analyses. For 3D closed surfaces, the roughness is calculated by comparing the real surface against the benchmark surface reconstructed by the spherical harmonic analyses. The local deviation as well as the overall roughness of 2D closed outlines, and 3D closed surfaces, can be evaluated via the approach. After analyzing the roughness of two types of particles with different morphological characteristics by the proposed approaches, it is found that the 2D arithmetic average roughness and the 2D root mean square roughness are well correlated, and so are their 3D counterparts. Nevertheless, values of the 2D and 3D indices are not well correlated for each type of particles, and the particles with different texture can be more clearly distinguished from each other based on the 3D roughness parameters than on the 2D counterparts. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 438
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Kendall Shape Space Approach to 3D Shape Estimation from 2D Landmarks
    Paskin, Martha
    Baum, Daniel
    Dean, Mason N.
    Von Tycowicz, Christoph
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2022, PT II, 2022, 13662 : 363 - 379
  • [42] In Perfect Shape: Certifiably Optimal 3D Shape Reconstruction from 2D Landmarks
    Yang, Heng
    Carlone, Luca
    2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2020, : 618 - 627
  • [43] 3D reconstruction and visualization of microstructure surfaces from 2D images
    Samak, D.
    Fischer, A.
    Rittel, D.
    CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (01) : 149 - 152
  • [44] PreMosa: extracting 2D surfaces from 3D microscopy mosaics
    Blasse, Corinna
    Saalfeld, Stephan
    Etournay, Raphael
    Sagner, Andreas
    Eaton, Suzanne
    Myers, Eugene W.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 33 (16) : 2563 - 2569
  • [45] Minimal simple closed 18-surfaces and a topological preservation of 3D surfaces
    Han, SE
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2006, 176 (02) : 120 - 134
  • [46] Modeling the Effect of Roughness on Ultrasonic Scattering in 2D and 3D
    Cegla, Frederic
    Jarvis, Andrew
    40TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: INCORPORATING THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BARKHAUSEN NOISE AND MICROMAGNETIC TESTING, VOLS 33A & 33B, 2014, 1581 : 595 - 601
  • [47] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [48] ACCURACY OF 2D AND 3D MEASUREMENT OF PLACENTA SHAPE
    Getreuer, Pascal
    Girardi, Theresa
    Li, Yingying
    Salafia, Carolyn
    Dalton, Jeffrey
    Katzman, Philip
    Ruffolo, Luis
    Miller, Richard
    Moye, John
    PLACENTA, 2012, 33 (09) : A22 - A22
  • [49] Efficient 2D Simulation on Moving 3D Surfaces
    Morgenroth, D.
    Reinhardt, S.
    Weiskopf, D.
    Eberhardt, B.
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2020, 39 (08) : 27 - 38
  • [50] Comparison of random surfaces 2D and 3D parameters
    Pawlus, P.
    Reizer, R.
    Annals of DAAAM for 2006 & Proceedings of the 17th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS, 2006, : 293 - 294