Effects of subclinical depression on prefrontal-striatal model-based and model-free learning

被引:6
|
作者
Heo, Suyeon [1 ]
Sung, Yoondo [1 ]
Lee, Sang Wan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Dept Bio & Brain Engn, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Brain & Cognit Engn Program, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Inst Hlth Sci Technol, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Inst Artificial Intelligence, Daejeon, South Korea
[5] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Ctr Neurosci Inspired AI, Daejeon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; HABITUAL CONTROL; DECISION-MAKING; REWARD; PREDICTION; SYMPTOMS; DOPAMINE; CORTEX; ERROR; ARBITRATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Depression is characterized by deficits in the reinforcement learning (RL) process. Although many computational and neural studies have extended our knowledge of the impact of depression on RL, most focus on habitual control (model-free RL), yielding a relatively poor understanding of goal-directed control (model-based RL) and arbitration control to find a balance between the two. We investigated the effects of subclinical depression on model-based and model-free learning in the prefrontal-striatal circuitry. First, we found that subclinical depression is associated with the attenuated state and reward prediction error representation in the insula and caudate. Critically, we found that it accompanies the disrupted arbitration control between model-based and model-free learning in the predominantly inferior lateral prefrontal cortex and frontopolar cortex. We also found that depression undermines the ability to exploit viable options, called exploitation sensitivity. These findings characterize how subclinical depression influences different levels of the decision-making hierarchy, advancing previous conflicting views that depression simply influences either habitual or goal-directed control. Our study creates possibilities for various clinical applications, such as early diagnosis and behavioral therapy design. Author summary Human decision making is known to be driven by at least two distinct processes, goal-directed and habitual learning. Previous studies argued that these systems and their interaction are disrupted in depression. However, we have limited understanding of the integration of the two systems and how this case extends to early or mild depression. We used a computational model and fMRI to address this issue. We found that depression-related changes were observed in the different levels of the decision making process. Notably, we found that depressive individuals have higher sensitivity of the habitual learning process, indicating the impairment of the proper integration of the two. Our findings raise the hope about developing clinical applications for the early diagnosis of this disorder, as well as using behavioral/cognitive therapy or brain stimulus techniques for restoring the balance between goal-directed and habitual learning in individuals with subclinical depression.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Model-based and model-free filtering of genomic data
    Nounou M.N.
    Nounou H.N.
    Mansouri M.
    [J]. Network Modeling and Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, 2013, 2 (03): : 109 - 121
  • [42] Reliance on model-based and model-free control in obesity
    Lieneke K. Janssen
    Florian P. Mahner
    Florian Schlagenhauf
    Lorenz Deserno
    Annette Horstmann
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [43] Model-Based and Model-Free Decisions in Alcohol Dependence
    Sebold, Miriam
    Deserno, Lorenz
    Nebe, Stefan
    Schad, Daniel J.
    Garbusow, Maria
    Haegele, Claudia
    Keller, Juergen
    Juenger, Elisabeth
    Kathmann, Norbert
    Smolka, Michael
    Rapp, Michael A.
    Schlagenhauf, Florian
    Heinz, Andreas
    Huys, Quentin J. M.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2014, 70 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [44] Benchmarking model-free and model-based optimal control
    Koryakovskiy, Ivan
    Kudruss, Manuel
    Babuska, Robert
    Caarls, Wouter
    Kirches, Christian
    Mombaur, Katja
    Schloeder, Johannes P.
    Vallery, Heike
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2017, 92 : 81 - 90
  • [45] LEARNING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: NEURAL MARKERS OF MODEL-FREE AND MODEL-BASED LEARNING IN PROBABILISTIC ENVIRONMENTS
    Wurm, Franz
    Ernst, Benjamin
    Steinhauser, Marco
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 : S127 - S127
  • [46] Combining Model-Based and Model-Free Updates for Trajectory-Centric Reinforcement Learning
    Chebotar, Yevgen
    Hausman, Karol
    Zhang, Marvin
    Sukhatme, Gaurav
    Schaal, Stefan
    Levine, Sergey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 70, 2017, 70
  • [47] Predictive representations can link model-based reinforcement learning to model-free mechanisms
    Russek, Evan M.
    Momennejad, Ida
    Botvinick, Matthew M.
    Gershman, Samuel J.
    Daw, Nathaniel D.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (09)
  • [48] Extraversion differentiates between model-based and model-free strategies in a reinforcement learning task
    Skatova, Anya
    Chan, Patricia A.
    Daw, Nathaniel D.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [49] Dyna-style Model-based reinforcement learning with Model-Free Policy Optimization
    Dong, Kun
    Luo, Yongle
    Wang, Yuxin
    Liu, Yu
    Qu, Chengeng
    Zhang, Qiang
    Cheng, Erkang
    Sun, Zhiyong
    Song, Bo
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2024, 287
  • [50] The modulation of acute stress on model-free and model-based reinforcement learning in gambling disorder
    Wyckmans, Florent
    Banerjee, Nilosmita
    Saeremans, Melanie
    Otto, Ross
    Kornreich, Charles
    Vanderijst, Laetitia
    Gruson, Damien
    Carbone, Vincenzo
    Bechara, Antoine
    Buchanan, Tony
    Noel, Xavier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2022, 11 (03) : 831 - 844