Effects of subclinical depression on prefrontal-striatal model-based and model-free learning

被引:6
|
作者
Heo, Suyeon [1 ]
Sung, Yoondo [1 ]
Lee, Sang Wan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Dept Bio & Brain Engn, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Brain & Cognit Engn Program, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Inst Hlth Sci Technol, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Inst Artificial Intelligence, Daejeon, South Korea
[5] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, KAIST Ctr Neurosci Inspired AI, Daejeon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; HABITUAL CONTROL; DECISION-MAKING; REWARD; PREDICTION; SYMPTOMS; DOPAMINE; CORTEX; ERROR; ARBITRATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Depression is characterized by deficits in the reinforcement learning (RL) process. Although many computational and neural studies have extended our knowledge of the impact of depression on RL, most focus on habitual control (model-free RL), yielding a relatively poor understanding of goal-directed control (model-based RL) and arbitration control to find a balance between the two. We investigated the effects of subclinical depression on model-based and model-free learning in the prefrontal-striatal circuitry. First, we found that subclinical depression is associated with the attenuated state and reward prediction error representation in the insula and caudate. Critically, we found that it accompanies the disrupted arbitration control between model-based and model-free learning in the predominantly inferior lateral prefrontal cortex and frontopolar cortex. We also found that depression undermines the ability to exploit viable options, called exploitation sensitivity. These findings characterize how subclinical depression influences different levels of the decision-making hierarchy, advancing previous conflicting views that depression simply influences either habitual or goal-directed control. Our study creates possibilities for various clinical applications, such as early diagnosis and behavioral therapy design. Author summary Human decision making is known to be driven by at least two distinct processes, goal-directed and habitual learning. Previous studies argued that these systems and their interaction are disrupted in depression. However, we have limited understanding of the integration of the two systems and how this case extends to early or mild depression. We used a computational model and fMRI to address this issue. We found that depression-related changes were observed in the different levels of the decision making process. Notably, we found that depressive individuals have higher sensitivity of the habitual learning process, indicating the impairment of the proper integration of the two. Our findings raise the hope about developing clinical applications for the early diagnosis of this disorder, as well as using behavioral/cognitive therapy or brain stimulus techniques for restoring the balance between goal-directed and habitual learning in individuals with subclinical depression.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model-free, Model-based, and General Intelligence
    Geffner, Hector
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 10 - 17
  • [22] EEG-based classification of learning strategies : model-based and model-free reinforcement learning
    Kim, Dongjae
    Weston, Charles
    Lee, Sang Wan
    [J]. 2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCI), 2018, : 146 - 148
  • [23] Disruption of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Decreases Model-Based in Favor of Model-free Control in Humans
    Smittenaar, Peter
    FitzGerald, Thomas H. B.
    Romei, Vincenzo
    Wright, Nicholas D.
    Dolan, Raymond J.
    [J]. NEURON, 2013, 80 (04) : 914 - 919
  • [24] Presynaptic Dopamine Modulates the Balance of Model-free and Model-based Choice Behavior and its Prefrontal and Striatal Correlates - Implications for Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence
    Deserno, Lorenz
    Heinz, Andreas
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Schlagenhauf, Florian
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 75 (09) : 380S - 381S
  • [25] Model-free and model-based learning processes in the updating of explicit and implicit evaluations
    Kurdi, Benedek
    Gershman, Samuel J.
    Banaji, Mahzarin R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (13) : 6035 - 6044
  • [26] Parallel model-based and model-free reinforcement learning for card sorting performance
    Steinke, Alexander
    Lange, Florian
    Kopp, Bruno
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [27] Successor Features Combine Elements of Model-Free and Model-based Reinforcement Learning
    Lehnert, Lucas
    Littman, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2020, 21
  • [28] Model-based and model-free Pavlovian reward learning: Revaluation, revision, and revelation
    Peter Dayan
    Kent C. Berridge
    [J]. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2014, 14 : 473 - 492
  • [29] Variability in Dopamine Genes Dissociates Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
    Doll, Bradley B.
    Bath, Kevin G.
    Daw, Nathaniel D.
    Frank, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (04): : 1211 - 1222
  • [30] Neural Computations Underlying Arbitration between Model-Based and Model-free Learning
    Lee, Sang Wan
    Shimojo, Shinsuke
    O'Doherty, John P.
    [J]. NEURON, 2014, 81 (03) : 687 - 699