Biosafety assessment of transgenic plants in the greenhouse and the field - A case study of transgenic cucumber

被引:3
|
作者
Koga-Ban, Y [1 ]
Tabei, Y
Ishimoto, M
Nishizawa, Y
Tsuchiya, K
Imaizumi, N
Nakamura, H
Kayano, T
Tanaka, H
机构
[1] Natl Inst Agrobiol Sci, Plant Biotechnol Dept, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058502, Japan
[2] Natl Agr Res Ctr, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058666, Japan
来源
关键词
chitinase; genetically modified plant;
D O I
10.6090/jarq.38.167
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
We have developed transgenic cucumber plants Cucumis sativus L. resistant to gray mold (Booytis cinerea) by the expression of rice chitinase cDNA (Tabei et al. 1998). These transgenic plants were obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and the introduced rice chitinase cDNA was driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. The biosafety assessment of the transformed cucumber plants was carefully performed to confirm that their characteristics are equivalent to those of non-transgenic plants except for harboring gray mold resistance. The biosafety assessment was carried out successively in full-containment greenhouse, semi-containment greenhouse, isolated field, and finally in ordinary field trials. The following items were compared between transgenic and non-transgenic cucumber plants: (1) morphological characteristics of plants and fruits;, (2) reproductive characteristics, e.g. pollen morphology and fertility, longevity of the pollen, pollen dispersal by wind, and seed fertilities; (3) possibility of harmful influences on the environment due to the production of detrimental substances i.e. volatile compounds,,plant parts and root secreta; (4) influence on soil microflora and; (5) presence of remaining Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which was used as a vector in the production of the transgenic cucumber. Throughout the biosafety assessment, we did not find any substantial differences except the expression of rice chitinase gene and resistance to gray mold between transgenic and non-transgenic cucumber plants.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 174
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants
    Joaquima Messeguer
    Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2003, 73 : 201 - 212
  • [32] Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants
    Messeguer, J
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 2003, 73 (03) : 201 - 212
  • [33] Risk assessment strategies for transgenic plants
    Talas-Ogras, Tijen
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2011, 33 (03) : 647 - 657
  • [34] Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants
    Mike Wilkinson
    Heredity, 2000, 85 (3) : 303 - 304
  • [35] Multidisciplinary assessment of transgenic crop plants
    Hokkanen, HMT
    Tsaftaris, SA
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 45 (1-3) : 1 - 4
  • [36] Twenty years of transgenic plants resistant to Cucumber mosaic virus
    Morroni, Marco
    Thompson, Jeremy R.
    Tepfer, Mark
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2008, 21 (06) : 675 - 684
  • [37] Development of CMV- and TMV-resistant transgenic chili pepper: field performance and biosafety assessment
    Cai, Wen-Qi
    Fang, Rong-Xiang
    Shang, Hong-Sheng
    Wang, Xu
    Zhang, Feng-Li
    Li, Yue-Ren
    Zhang, Jiu-Chun
    Cheng, Xiao-Ying
    Wang, Gui-Ling
    Mang, Ke-Qiang
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2003, 11 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [38] OECD's biosafety work on ''large-scale'' releases of transgenic plants
    Sumida, S
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 45 (1-3) : 187 - 194
  • [39] Environmental release of transgenic trees in Canada - potential benefits and assessment of biosafety
    Mullin, TJ
    Bertrand, S
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1998, 74 (02): : 203 - 219
  • [40] A transgene-centered approach to the biosafety of transgenic phosphinothricin-tolerant plants
    Metz, PLJ
    Stiekema, WJ
    Nap, JP
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 1998, 4 (04) : 335 - 341