Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants

被引:0
|
作者
Joaquima Messeguer
机构
[1] Centre de Cabrils (IRTA),Departament de Genètica Vegetal
来源
关键词
cotton and potato; maize; rapeseed; risk assessment; rice; sugar beet; transgenic crops;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In most of the important crops in the world, gene flow between cultivars and between wild and weedy relatives has always taken place. Factors influencing this gene flow, such as the mating system, mode of pollination, mode of seed dispersal and the particular characteristics of the habitat where the crops grow, are difficult to evaluate and in consequence, the quantification of gene flow is not easy. Transgene flow from engineered crops to other cultivars or to their wild and weedy relatives is one of the major concerns in relation to the ecological risks associated with the commercial release of transgenic plants. With transgenic crops it is important to quantify this gene flow and to try to establish strategies to control or minimise it, taking into account the possible ecological effect of the newly introduced genes, whether advantageous or disadvantageous. The use of transgenic plants has proven to be an effective tool to quantify the gene flow to other cultivars of the same species or to wild and weedy relatives in all crops analysed. Here we review the major studies in this area, and conclude that the potential risk of gene flow has to be assessed case by case and caution is necessary when making general conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 212
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants
    Messeguer, J
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 2003, 73 (03) : 201 - 212
  • [2] Gene flow, risk assessment and the environmental release of transgenic plants
    Chandler, Stephen
    Dunwell, Jim M.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2008, 27 (01) : 25 - 49
  • [3] Chloroplast-transgenic plants are not a gene flow panacea
    Stewart, CN
    Prakash, CS
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 16 (05) : 401 - 401
  • [4] Letter 2: Chloroplast-transgenic plants are not a gene flow panacea
    Joseph E. Cummins
    Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16 : 401 - 401
  • [5] Letter 1: Chloroplast-transgenic plants are not a gene flow panacea
    C. Neal Stewart
    C. S. Prakash
    Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16 (5) : 401 - 401
  • [6] Interspecific gene flow as a component of risk assessment for transgenic Brassicas
    Chevre, AM
    Eber, F
    Baranger, A
    Kerlan, MC
    Barret, P
    Festoc, G
    Vallee, P
    Renard, M
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BRASSICAS: NINTH CRUCIFER GENETICS WORKSHOP, 1996, (407): : 169 - 179
  • [8] Gene flow from transgenic to nontransgenic soybean plants in the Cerrado region of Brazil
    Abud, S.
    de Souza, P. I. M.
    Vianna, G. R.
    Leonardecz, E.
    Moreira, C. T.
    Faleiro, F. G.
    Junior, J. N.
    Monteiro, P. M. F. O.
    Rech, E. L.
    Aragao, F. J. L.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2007, 6 (02) : 445 - 452
  • [9] Marker gene controversy in transgenic plants
    Malik, VS
    BIOTECHNOLOGY, BIOSAFETY, AND BIODIVERSITY: SCIENTIFIC AND ETHICAL ISSUES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 1999, : 65 - 90
  • [10] Marker Gene Controversy in Transgenic Plants
    Vedpal S. Malik
    M. K. Saroha
    Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1999, 8 (1) : 1 - 13