Participatory Action Research for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review

被引:4
|
作者
Lassi, Zohra S. [1 ,2 ]
Neideck, Ebony Grace [3 ]
Aylward, Bridget Mary [3 ]
Andraweera, Prabha H. [1 ,2 ]
Meherali, Salima [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
来源
SEXES | 2022年 / 3卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
sexual and reproductive health; participatory action research; co-design; adolescents; HIV PREVENTION; INTERVENTION; PHOTOVOICE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/sexes3010015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions are essential for the health of adolescents (10-19 years). Co-designing is a participatory approach to research, allowing for collaboration with academic and non-academic stakeholders in intervention development. Participatory action research (PAR) involves stakeholders throughout the planning, action, observation, and reflection stages of research. Current knowledge indicates that co-producing SRH interventions with adolescents increases a feeling of ownership, setting the scene for intervention adoption in implementation settings. Objectives: This scoping review aims to understand the extent of adolescents' participation in PAR steps for co-designed SRH interventions, including the barriers and facilitators in co-designing of SRH intervention, as well as its effectiveness on adolescents' SRH outcomes. Methods: Database searching of PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and organisational websites was performed, identifying 439 studies. Results: Upon screening, 30 studies (published between 2006-2021) met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identified that adolescents were involved in the planning and action stages of the interventions, but not in the observation and reflection stages. Although the review identified the barriers and facilitators for co-designing SRF interventions, none of the included studies reported on the effectiveness of co-designing SRH interventions with adolescents; therefore, meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusions: While no specific outcome of the interventions was reported, all papers agreed that adolescent co-designing in ASRH interventions should occur at all stages to increase understanding of local perceptions and develop a successful intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 208
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Participatory Action Research Among People With Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review
    Thomas, Elizabethmary
    Benjamin-Thomas, Tanya Elizabeth
    Sithambaram, Abirame
    Shankar, Janki
    Chen, Shu-Ping
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (1-2) : 3 - 19
  • [32] Adolescent sexual and reproductive health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of substantive focus, research volume, geographic distribution and Africa-led inquiry
    Ajayi, Anthony Idowu
    Otukpa, Emmanuel Oloche
    Mwoka, Meggie
    Kabiru, Caroline W.
    Ushie, Boniface Ayanbekongshie
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (02):
  • [33] Monitoring adolescent sexual and reproductive health
    Hindin, Michelle J.
    Tuncalp, Oezge
    Gerdts, Caitlin
    Gipson, Jessica D.
    Say, Lale
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2016, 94 (03) : 159 - 159
  • [34] Adolescent sexual and reproductive health services
    Villalobos, Aremis
    Suarez-Lopez, Leticia
    de la Vara-Salazar, Elvia
    Hubert, Celia
    Hernandez, Bernardo
    Varela-Chavez, Yolanda
    Torres-Chaires, Mayra Mahogany
    Avila-Burgos, Leticia
    [J]. SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2024, 66 (04): : 479 - 487
  • [35] The State of Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
    Liang, Mengjia
    Simelane, Sandile
    Fortuny Fillo, Guillem
    Chalasani, Satvika
    Weny, Katherine
    Canelos, Pablo Salazar
    Jenkins, Lorna
    Moller, Ann-Beth
    Chandra-Mouli, Venkatraman
    Say, Lale
    Michielsen, Kristien
    Engel, Danielle Marie Claire
    Snow, Rachel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2019, 65 (06) : S3 - S15
  • [36] Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review of Potential Interventions
    Salam, Rehana A.
    Faqqah, Anadil
    Sajjad, Nida
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Das, Jai K.
    Kaufman, Miriam
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2016, 59 (04) : S11 - S28
  • [37] Mobile Phone Interventions for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review
    L'Engle, Kelly L.
    Mangone, Emily R.
    Parcesepe, Angela M.
    Agarwal, Smisha
    Ippoliti, Nicole B.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (03)
  • [38] Interventions for adolescent mental, sexual and reproductive health in West Africa: A review
    Agyepong, Irene A.
    Agblevor, Emelia
    Odopey, Selase
    Addom, Selasie
    Afun, Nana Efua Enyimayew
    Agyekum, Mary Pomaa
    Asante, Paapa Yaw
    Aye, Grace Emmanuelle
    Darko, Natasha
    Diarra, Aissa
    Fenny, Ama Pokuaa
    Gladzah, Annick
    Ibrahim, Nassirou
    Kagambega, Aline
    Wallace, Lauren J.
    Novignon, Jacob
    Yaogo, Maurice
    Da Sliva, Roxane Borgs
    Ensor, Tim
    Mirzoev, Tolib
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2024, 8
  • [39] Sexual Communication between Adolescent Partners: A Scoping Review and Directions for Future Research
    Widman, Laura
    Maheux, Anne J.
    Craig, Elizabeth
    Evans-Paulson, Reina
    Choukas-Bradley, Sophia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2022, 59 (08) : 984 - 999
  • [40] Programs to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health in the US: a review of the evidence
    Manlove, Jennifer
    Fish, Heather
    Moore, Kristin Anderson
    [J]. ADOLESCENT HEALTH MEDICINE AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 6 : 47 - 79