Participatory Action Research for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review

被引:4
|
作者
Lassi, Zohra S. [1 ,2 ]
Neideck, Ebony Grace [3 ]
Aylward, Bridget Mary [3 ]
Andraweera, Prabha H. [1 ,2 ]
Meherali, Salima [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
来源
SEXES | 2022年 / 3卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
sexual and reproductive health; participatory action research; co-design; adolescents; HIV PREVENTION; INTERVENTION; PHOTOVOICE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/sexes3010015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions are essential for the health of adolescents (10-19 years). Co-designing is a participatory approach to research, allowing for collaboration with academic and non-academic stakeholders in intervention development. Participatory action research (PAR) involves stakeholders throughout the planning, action, observation, and reflection stages of research. Current knowledge indicates that co-producing SRH interventions with adolescents increases a feeling of ownership, setting the scene for intervention adoption in implementation settings. Objectives: This scoping review aims to understand the extent of adolescents' participation in PAR steps for co-designed SRH interventions, including the barriers and facilitators in co-designing of SRH intervention, as well as its effectiveness on adolescents' SRH outcomes. Methods: Database searching of PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and organisational websites was performed, identifying 439 studies. Results: Upon screening, 30 studies (published between 2006-2021) met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identified that adolescents were involved in the planning and action stages of the interventions, but not in the observation and reflection stages. Although the review identified the barriers and facilitators for co-designing SRF interventions, none of the included studies reported on the effectiveness of co-designing SRH interventions with adolescents; therefore, meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusions: While no specific outcome of the interventions was reported, all papers agreed that adolescent co-designing in ASRH interventions should occur at all stages to increase understanding of local perceptions and develop a successful intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 208
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Knowledge translation strategies for policy and action focused on sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and well-being: a rapid scoping review
    Curran, Janet A.
    Gallant, Allyson J.
    Wong, Helen
    Shin, Hwayeon Danielle
    Urquhart, Robin
    Kontak, Julia
    Wozney, Lori
    Boulos, Leah
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar
    Langlois, Etienne, V
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [22] A critical review of adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya
    Manguro, Griffins
    Temmerman, Marleen
    [J]. MED, 2022, 3 (06): : 364 - 368
  • [23] Accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in humanitarian settings: a scoping review
    Schaaf, Marta
    Boydell, Victoria
    Sheff, Mallory C.
    Kay, Christina
    Torabi, Fatemeh
    Khosla, Rajat
    [J]. CONFLICT AND HEALTH, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [24] Accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in humanitarian settings: a scoping review
    Marta Schaaf
    Victoria Boydell
    Mallory C. Sheff
    Christina Kay
    Fatemeh Torabi
    Rajat Khosla
    [J]. Conflict and Health, 14
  • [25] Priority setting in mental health research: a scoping review of participatory methods
    Guell, E.
    Benito-Amat, C.
    Molas-Gallart, J.
    [J]. MENTAL HEALTH & PREVENTION, 2023, 30
  • [26] A scoping review of strategies for adolescents' sexual and reproductive health role modelling
    Ramalepa, Tshiamo N.
    Netangaheni, Thinavhuyo R.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN FAMILY PRACTICE, 2024, 66 (01)
  • [27] Sexual and reproductive health and rights of "last mile" adolescents: a scoping review
    Nowshin, Nahela
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Davison, Colleen M.
    Harms, Sheila
    Kwagala, Betty
    Mutabazi, Miriam G.
    Niec, Anne
    [J]. SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [28] A scoping review of sexual and reproductive health recommendations in the context of migration to Europe
    Rossoni, I.
    Chollier, M.
    Dudushi, R.
    Ghigo, J.
    Padovese, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2023, 37 (12) : 2450 - 2461
  • [29] A scoping review on sexual and reproductive health behaviors among Tanzanian adolescents
    Nkata, Hamida
    Teixeira, Raquel
    Barros, Henrique
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2019, 40 (01)
  • [30] Sexual and reproductive health services provided by community pharmacists: a scoping review
    Navarrete, Javiera
    Yuksel, Nese
    Schindel, Theresa J.
    Hughes, Christine A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):