Participatory Action Research for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review

被引:4
|
作者
Lassi, Zohra S. [1 ,2 ]
Neideck, Ebony Grace [3 ]
Aylward, Bridget Mary [3 ]
Andraweera, Prabha H. [1 ,2 ]
Meherali, Salima [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
来源
SEXES | 2022年 / 3卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
sexual and reproductive health; participatory action research; co-design; adolescents; HIV PREVENTION; INTERVENTION; PHOTOVOICE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/sexes3010015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions are essential for the health of adolescents (10-19 years). Co-designing is a participatory approach to research, allowing for collaboration with academic and non-academic stakeholders in intervention development. Participatory action research (PAR) involves stakeholders throughout the planning, action, observation, and reflection stages of research. Current knowledge indicates that co-producing SRH interventions with adolescents increases a feeling of ownership, setting the scene for intervention adoption in implementation settings. Objectives: This scoping review aims to understand the extent of adolescents' participation in PAR steps for co-designed SRH interventions, including the barriers and facilitators in co-designing of SRH intervention, as well as its effectiveness on adolescents' SRH outcomes. Methods: Database searching of PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and organisational websites was performed, identifying 439 studies. Results: Upon screening, 30 studies (published between 2006-2021) met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identified that adolescents were involved in the planning and action stages of the interventions, but not in the observation and reflection stages. Although the review identified the barriers and facilitators for co-designing SRF interventions, none of the included studies reported on the effectiveness of co-designing SRH interventions with adolescents; therefore, meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusions: While no specific outcome of the interventions was reported, all papers agreed that adolescent co-designing in ASRH interventions should occur at all stages to increase understanding of local perceptions and develop a successful intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 208
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Participatory Action Research Approach to improve Adolescent Girls' Reproductive Health
    Khalesi, Zahra Bostani
    Sigaroudi, Abdolhosein Emami
    Farmanbar, Rabiollah
    [J]. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2020, 24 (04): : 416 - 420
  • [2] Mapping adolescent sexual and reproductive health research in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a scoping review
    Ajayi, Anthony Idowu
    Ushie, Boniface Ayanbekongshie
    Mwoka, Meggie
    Igonya, Emmy Kageha
    Ouedraogo, Ramatou
    Juma, Kenneth
    Aboderin, Isabella
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [3] Sexual and reproductive health interventions geared toward adolescent males: A scoping review
    Sawalma, Mariam
    Shalash, Aisha
    Wahdan, Yasmeen
    Nemer, Maysaa
    Khalawi, Hala
    Hijazi, Bassel
    Abu-Rmeileh, Niveen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2023, 73 : e19 - e26
  • [4] Evaluation of a youth-led participatory action research to address adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights issues in Senegal
    Fortin, Genevieve
    Vandermorris, Ashley
    Sall, Mohamadou
    McKinnon, Britt
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 17 (11) : 2977 - 2990
  • [5] Sexual and reproductive health implementation research in humanitarian contexts: a scoping review
    Norton, Alexandra
    Tappis, Hannah
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [6] Decolonization in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Methods: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Stevens-Uninsky, Maya
    Barkhad, Aisha
    MacDonald, Tonya
    Perez, Alexander
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [7] Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
    Herve, Caroline
    Laneuville, Pascale
    Lapointe, Luc
    [J]. POLAR RECORD, 2023, 59
  • [8] A Scoping Review of Participatory Action Research to Promote Mental Health and Resilience in Youth and Adolescents
    Ruth Kjærsti Raanaas
    H. Ø. Bjøntegaard
    L. Shaw
    [J]. Adolescent Research Review, 2020, 5 : 137 - 152
  • [9] A Scoping Review of Participatory Action Research to Promote Mental Health and Resilience in Youth and Adolescents
    Raanaas, Ruth Kjaersti
    Bjontegaard, H. O.
    Shaw, L.
    [J]. ADOLESCENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 5 (02) : 137 - 152
  • [10] Enhancing Human-Centered Design With Youth-Led Participatory Action Research Approaches for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Programming
    Fakoya, Ibidun
    Cole, Claire
    Larkin, Chris
    Punton, Melanie
    Brown, Eleanor
    Ballonoff Suleiman, Ahna
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2022, 23 (01) : 25 - 31