Assessment of Device-Related Thrombus and Associated Clinical Outcomes With the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from the PROTECT-AF Trial)

被引:96
|
作者
Main, Michael L. [1 ]
Fan, Dali [2 ]
Reddy, Vivek Y. [3 ]
Holmes, David R. [4 ]
Gordon, Nicole T. [5 ]
Coggins, Tina R. [1 ]
House, John A. [1 ]
Liao, Lawrence [6 ]
Rabineau, Dawn [6 ]
Latus, George G. [5 ]
Huber, Kenneth C. [1 ]
Sievert, Horst [7 ]
Wright, Richard F. [8 ]
Doshi, Shephal K. [8 ]
Douglas, Pamela S. [6 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Boston Sci Corp, St Paul, MN USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[7] Cardiovasc Ctr Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[8] St Johns Hlth Ctr, Pacific Heart Inst & Providence, Santa Monica, CA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2016年 / 117卷 / 07期
关键词
SPONTANEOUS ECHO CONTRAST; AMPLATZER CARDIAC PLUG; THROMBOEMBOLIC RISK; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; STROKE; STANDARDS; VELOCITY; WARFARIN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). LA device-related thrombus (DRT) is poorly defined and understood. We aimed to (1) develop consensus echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for DRT; (2) estimate the incidence of DRT; and (3) determine clinical event rates in patients with DRT. In phase 1 (training), a training manual was developed and reviewed by 3 echocardiographers with left atrial appendage closure device experience. All available transesophageal (TEE) studies in the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for embolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation (PROTECT-AF) trial patients with suspected DRT were reviewed in 2 subsequent phases. In phase 2 (primary blind read), each reviewer independently scored each study for DRT, and final echo criteria were developed. Unanimously scored studies were considered adjudicated, whereas all others were reevaluated by all reviewers in phase 3 (group adjudication read). DRT was suspected in 35 of 485 patients by the site investigator, the echocardiography core laboratory, or both; 93 of the individual TEE studies were available for review. In phase 2, 3 readers agreed on 67 (72%) of time points. Based on phases 1 and 2, 5 DRT criteria were developed. In phase 3, studies without agreement in phase 2 were adjudicated using these Criteria. Overall, at least 1 TEE was DRT positive in 27 (5.7%) PROTECT-AF patients. Stroke, peripheral embolism, or cardiac/unexplained death occurred in subjects with DRT at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up. In conclusion, DRT were identified on at least 1 TEE in 27 PROTECT-AF patients, indicating a DRT incidence of 5.7%. Primary efficacy events in patients with DRT occurred at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up, intermediate in frequency between event rates previously reported for the overall device and warfarin arms in PROTECT-AF. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFICACY OF LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE WITH WATCHMAN DEVICE AMONG PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILUREEFFICACY OF LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE WITH WATCHMAN DEVICE AMONG PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE
    Mir, Junaid
    Al-Ahmad, Majd
    Al Ahmad, Anas
    CHEST, 2024, 166 (04) : 766A - 766A
  • [32] TYPES OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND DEVICE-RELATED THROMBUS AFTER LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION DEVICE IMPLANTATION: A META-ANALYSIS
    Kanitsoraphan, Chanavuth
    Techorueangwiwat, Chol
    Shah, Parthav
    Kuniyoshi, Jason
    Nagamine, Todd
    Techasatian, Witina
    Yeo, Jihun
    Kanjanauthai, Somsupha
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 878 - 878
  • [34] Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device-Related Thrombus Certainties and Uncertainties
    Valderrabano, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (14) : 1537 - 1539
  • [35] Challenges and advances in device-related thrombus in left atrial appendage occlusion
    Tanaka, Takamasa
    Kawai, Kenji
    Ellis, Christopher R.
    Srivastava, Mukta
    Kawakami, Rika
    Konishi, Takao
    Shiraki, Tatsuya
    Sekimoto, Teruo
    Virmani, Renu
    Finn, Aloke, V
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 20 (7-8) : 343 - 358
  • [36] Multicenter registry of the Watchman left atrial appendage closure device for patients with atrial fibrillation in Japan: The TERMINATOR registry
    Matsumoto, T.
    Nakajima, Y.
    Kubo, S.
    Fukunaga, M.
    Saito, S.
    Hara, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 : 109 - 109
  • [37] Cost effectiveness of left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device for atrial fibrillation patients with absolute contraindications to warfarin
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    Akehurst, Ronald L.
    Armstrong, Shannon O.
    Amorosi, Stacey L.
    Brereton, Nic
    Hertz, Deanna S.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (07): : 979 - 986
  • [38] DEVICE-RELATED THROMBUS AFTER LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE COMPLICATED BY ACUTE LIMB ISCHEMIA
    Aglan, Amro
    Ijaz, Sardar H.
    Clayman, Jeffrey Owen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 3978 - 3978
  • [39] An updated meta-analysis of device related thrombus following left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Zhang, Song
    Xiong, Si-huai
    Guan, Yu-gen
    Zhao, Xian-xian
    Qin, Yong-wen
    Guo, Zhi-fu
    Bai, Yuan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [40] Transient Ischemic Attack Secondary to Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Hussain, Khandakar M.
    Jain, Ashish
    Ahmad, Nuzhat T.
    Hussain, K. M. Anwar
    Aldergash, Salah
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)