Anticholinergic Drug Burden Tools/Scales and Adverse Outcomes in Different Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Reviews

被引:86
|
作者
Welsh, Tomas J. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
van der Wardt, Veronika [3 ]
Ojo, Grace [3 ]
Gordon, Adam L. [3 ,4 ]
Gladman, John R. F. [3 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal United Hosp, Res Inst Care Older People RICE, Combe Pk, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[2] Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Bath, Somerset, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, England
[4] Derby Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Derby, Derby, England
[5] Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlth Res & Care CLAHRC, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Nottingham, Notts, England
关键词
POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS; FRAIL ELDERLY POPULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OLDER-PEOPLE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; RISK SCALE; PALLIATIVE CARE; INDEX; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed. Objective This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to describe their rationale, the settings in which they have been used and the outcomes associated with them. Methods A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2016 to identify systematic reviews describing anticholinergic burden scales or tools. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. The final selection of reviews was critically appraised using the ROBIS tool and pre-defined data were extracted; the primary data of interest were the anticholinergic burden scales or tools used. Results Five reviews were identified for analysis containing a total of 62 original articles. Eighteen anticholinergic burden scales or tools were identified with variation in their derivation, content and how they quantified the anticholinergic activity of medications. The Drug Burden Index was the most commonly used scale or tool in community and database studies, while the Anticholinergic Risk Scale was used more frequently in care homes and hospital settings. The association between anticholinergic burden and clinical outcomes varied by index and study. Falls and hospitalisation were consistently found to be associated with anticholinergic burden. Mortality, delirium, physical function and cognition were not consistently associated. Conclusions Anticholinergic burden scales vary in their rationale, use and association with outcomes. This review showed that the concept of anticholinergic burden has been variably defined and inconsistently described using a number of indices with different content and scoring. The association between adverse outcomes and anticholinergic burden varies between scores and has not been conclusively established.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of main adverse drug reactions in systematic reviews and clinical trials of heparins for surgery prophylaxis
    Daniela R Junqueira
    Trials, 16
  • [42] Assessment of main adverse drug reactions in systematic reviews and clinical trials of heparins for surgery prophylaxis
    Junqueira, Daniela R.
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [43] Predicting functional adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients: A systematic review of screening tools
    M. De Saint-Hubert
    D. Schoevaerdts
    P. Cornette
    W. D’Hoore
    B. Boland
    C. Swine
    The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2010, 14 : 394 - 399
  • [44] Predicting functional adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients: A systematic review of screening tools
    De Saint-Hubert, M.
    Schoevaerdts, D.
    Cornette, P.
    D'Hoore, W.
    Boland, B.
    Swine, C.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2010, 14 (05): : 394 - 399
  • [45] A Systematic Review of the Unintended Consequences of Clinical Interventions to Reduce Adverse Outcomes
    Manojlovich, Milisa
    Lee, Soohee
    Lauseng, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2016, 12 (04) : 173 - 179
  • [46] The Impact of Deprescribing Interventions on the Drug Burden Index and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Liu, Bonnie M.
    Redston, Mitchell R.
    Fujita, Kenji
    Thillainadesan, Janani
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 25 (07)
  • [47] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF POLYPHARMACY DEFINITION, ASSESSMENT TOOLS, AND ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Masnoon, Nashwa
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Kalisch, Lisa
    Caughey, Gillian
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (04): : E28 - E29
  • [48] Clinicians' perspectives of immersive tools in clinical mental health settings: a systematic scoping review
    Cushnan, Jessica
    McCafferty, Paul
    Best, Paul
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [49] The impact of pharmacist care on diabetes outcomes in primary care settings: An umbrella review of published systematic reviews
    Abdulrhim, Sara
    Sankaralingam, Sowndramalingam
    Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham Mohamed
    Awaisu, Ahmed
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2020, 14 (05) : 393 - 400
  • [50] Reducing the burden of malaria in different eco-epidemiological settings with environmental management: a systematic review
    Keiser, J
    Singer, BH
    Utzinger, J
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 5 (11): : 695 - 708