Anticholinergic Drug Burden Tools/Scales and Adverse Outcomes in Different Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Reviews

被引:86
|
作者
Welsh, Tomas J. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
van der Wardt, Veronika [3 ]
Ojo, Grace [3 ]
Gordon, Adam L. [3 ,4 ]
Gladman, John R. F. [3 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal United Hosp, Res Inst Care Older People RICE, Combe Pk, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[2] Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Bath, Somerset, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, England
[4] Derby Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Derby, Derby, England
[5] Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlth Res & Care CLAHRC, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Nottingham, Notts, England
关键词
POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS; FRAIL ELDERLY POPULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OLDER-PEOPLE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; RISK SCALE; PALLIATIVE CARE; INDEX; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed. Objective This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to describe their rationale, the settings in which they have been used and the outcomes associated with them. Methods A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2016 to identify systematic reviews describing anticholinergic burden scales or tools. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. The final selection of reviews was critically appraised using the ROBIS tool and pre-defined data were extracted; the primary data of interest were the anticholinergic burden scales or tools used. Results Five reviews were identified for analysis containing a total of 62 original articles. Eighteen anticholinergic burden scales or tools were identified with variation in their derivation, content and how they quantified the anticholinergic activity of medications. The Drug Burden Index was the most commonly used scale or tool in community and database studies, while the Anticholinergic Risk Scale was used more frequently in care homes and hospital settings. The association between anticholinergic burden and clinical outcomes varied by index and study. Falls and hospitalisation were consistently found to be associated with anticholinergic burden. Mortality, delirium, physical function and cognition were not consistently associated. Conclusions Anticholinergic burden scales vary in their rationale, use and association with outcomes. This review showed that the concept of anticholinergic burden has been variably defined and inconsistently described using a number of indices with different content and scoring. The association between adverse outcomes and anticholinergic burden varies between scores and has not been conclusively established.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The economic burden of preventable adverse drug reactions. A systematic review
    Formica, Dario
    Cutroneo, Paola M.
    Sultana, Janet
    Ingrasciotta, Ylenia
    Salvo, Francesco
    Spina, Edoardo
    Trifiro, Gianluca
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 313 - 313
  • [22] Treatment of periodontal disease in pregnancy for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
    Khan, Najia Sajjad
    Craven, Rebecca
    Rafiq, Ayesha
    Rafiq, Anam
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (03) : 611 - 620
  • [23] IMPACT OF DRUG POLICY TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES ON ECONOMIC, CLINICAL AND HUMANISTIC OUTCOMES IN CANADA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    MacKinnon, N. J.
    McCaffrey, K. J.
    Hartnell, N. R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2005, 58 : 29 - 30
  • [24] A systematic review and meta-analysis on serum anticholinergic activity and adverse outcomes in older people
    Salahudeen, M. S.
    Chyou, T. -y.
    Nishtala, P. S.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2016, 12 (05): : E35 - E36
  • [25] The Association Between the Clinical Frailty Scale and Adverse Health Outcomes in Older Adults in Acute Clinical Settings - A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Erhag, Hanna Falk
    Guonadottir, Gudny
    Alfredsson, Joakim
    Cederholm, Tommy
    Ekerstad, Niklas
    Religa, Dorota
    Nellgard, Bengt
    Wilhelmson, Katarina
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2023, 18 : 249 - 261
  • [26] The economic burden of preventable adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of observational studies
    Formica, D.
    Sultana, J.
    Cutroneo, P. M.
    Lucchesi, S.
    Angelica, R.
    Crisafulli, S.
    Ingrasciotta, Y.
    Salvo, F.
    Spina, E.
    Trifiro, G.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 17 (07) : 681 - 695
  • [27] Trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in hospitalised children: A systematic review
    Arab, Rama
    Cornu, Catherine
    Kilo, Roubi
    Portefaix, Aurelie
    Fretes-Bonett, Beatriz
    Hergibo, Fanny
    Kassai, Behrouz
    Nguyen, Kim An
    THERAPIE, 2022, 77 (05): : 527 - 539
  • [28] Trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in hospitalized children: A systematic review
    Arab, R.
    Cornu, C.
    Kilo, R.
    Portefaix, A.
    Fretes-Bonett, B.
    Hergibo, F.
    Kassai, B.
    Nguyen, K.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 35 : 165 - 165
  • [29] Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review
    Penedones, Ana
    Marques, Francisco Batel
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2018, 60 (02) : 55 - 68
  • [30] Incidence, causes, and consequences of preventable adverse drug reactions occurring in inpatients: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Wolfe, Dianna
    Yazdi, Fatemeh
    Kanji, Salmaan
    Burry, Lisa
    Beck, Andrew
    Butler, Claire
    Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
    Hamel, Candyce
    Hersi, Mona
    Skidmore, Becky
    Moher, David
    Hutton, Brian
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):