Anticholinergic Drug Burden Tools/Scales and Adverse Outcomes in Different Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Reviews

被引:86
|
作者
Welsh, Tomas J. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
van der Wardt, Veronika [3 ]
Ojo, Grace [3 ]
Gordon, Adam L. [3 ,4 ]
Gladman, John R. F. [3 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal United Hosp, Res Inst Care Older People RICE, Combe Pk, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[2] Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Bath, Somerset, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, England
[4] Derby Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Derby, Derby, England
[5] Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlth Res & Care CLAHRC, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Nottingham, Notts, England
关键词
POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS; FRAIL ELDERLY POPULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OLDER-PEOPLE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; RISK SCALE; PALLIATIVE CARE; INDEX; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed. Objective This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to describe their rationale, the settings in which they have been used and the outcomes associated with them. Methods A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2016 to identify systematic reviews describing anticholinergic burden scales or tools. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. The final selection of reviews was critically appraised using the ROBIS tool and pre-defined data were extracted; the primary data of interest were the anticholinergic burden scales or tools used. Results Five reviews were identified for analysis containing a total of 62 original articles. Eighteen anticholinergic burden scales or tools were identified with variation in their derivation, content and how they quantified the anticholinergic activity of medications. The Drug Burden Index was the most commonly used scale or tool in community and database studies, while the Anticholinergic Risk Scale was used more frequently in care homes and hospital settings. The association between anticholinergic burden and clinical outcomes varied by index and study. Falls and hospitalisation were consistently found to be associated with anticholinergic burden. Mortality, delirium, physical function and cognition were not consistently associated. Conclusions Anticholinergic burden scales vary in their rationale, use and association with outcomes. This review showed that the concept of anticholinergic burden has been variably defined and inconsistently described using a number of indices with different content and scoring. The association between adverse outcomes and anticholinergic burden varies between scores and has not been conclusively established.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anticholinergic Drug Burden Tools/Scales and Adverse Outcomes in Different Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Reviews
    Tomas J. Welsh
    Veronika van der Wardt
    Grace Ojo
    Adam L. Gordon
    John R. F. Gladman
    Drugs & Aging, 2018, 35 : 523 - 538
  • [2] Anticholinergic drug burden: a systematic review of scales and their impact on clinical outcomes
    Lisibach, A.
    Benelli, V.
    Csajka, C.
    Lutters, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (01) : 292 - 292
  • [3] Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review
    Salahudeen, Mohammed Saji
    Duffull, Stephen B.
    Nishtala, Prasad S.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2015, 15
  • [4] Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review
    Mohammed Saji Salahudeen
    Stephen B Duffull
    Prasad S Nishtala
    BMC Geriatrics, 15
  • [5] Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review
    Angela Lisibach
    Valérie Benelli
    Marco Giacomo Ceppi
    Karin Waldner-Knogler
    Chantal Csajka
    Monika Lutters
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021, 77 : 147 - 162
  • [6] Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review
    Lisibach, Angela
    Benelli, Valerie
    Ceppi, Marco Giacomo
    Waldner-Knogler, Karin
    Csajka, Chantal
    Lutters, Monika
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 77 (02) : 147 - 162
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM ANTICHOLINERGIC BURDEN DERIVED FROM DIFFERENT RISK SCALES WITH ADVERSE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN THE ELDERLY
    Hsu, W.
    Lin, C.
    Wen, Y.
    Chen, L.
    Hsiao, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A903 - A903
  • [8] Anticholinergic Drug Burden and Delirium: A Systematic Review
    Egberts, Angelique
    Moreno-Gonzalez, Rafael
    Alan, Hava
    Ziere, Gijsbertus
    Mattace-Raso, Francesco U. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (01) : 65 - +
  • [9] Variation of adverse drug events in different settings in Africa: a systematic review
    Nyame, Linda
    Hu, Yuhua
    Xue, Hui
    Fiagbey, Emmanuel D. K.
    Li, Xi
    Tian, Yong
    Fan, Lijun
    Du, Wei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 29 (01) : 333
  • [10] Assessing the feasibility of anticholinergic burden scales and measures in administrative data: A systematic review
    Srikartika, Valentina M.
    Ha, Ninh
    Youens, David
    Moorin, Rachael
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2025, 129