Patient navigator team perceptions on the implementation of a citywide breast cancer patient navigation protocol: a qualitative study

被引:7
|
作者
Loo, Stephanie [1 ]
Mullikin, Katelyn [2 ,3 ]
Robbins, Charlotte [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Victoria [2 ,3 ]
Battaglia, Tracy A. [2 ,3 ]
Lemon, Stephenie C. [4 ]
Gunn, Christine [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Med Ctr, Womens Hlth Unit, Sect Gen Internal Med, Evans Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Chan Med Sch, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[5] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[6] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Dartmouth Canc Ctr, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient navigation; Breast cancer care; Social risk screenings; CFIR; IMPACT; DISPARITIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08090-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In 2018 Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP), an evidence-based patient navigation intervention aimed at addressing breast cancer care disparities, was implemented across six Boston hospitals. This study assesses patient navigator team member perspectives regarding implementation barriers and facilitators one year post-study implementation. Methods: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews at the six sites participating in the pragmatic TRIP trial from December 2019 to March 2021. Navigation team members involved with breast cancer care navigation processes at each site were interviewed at least 12 months after intervention implementation. Interview questions were designed to address domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), focusing on barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention that included 1) rigorous 11-step guidelines for navigation, 2) a shared patient registry and 3) a social risk screening and referral program. Analysis was structured using deductive codes representing domains and constructs within CFIR. Results: Seventeen interviews were conducted with patient navigators, their supervisors, and designated clinical champions. Participants identified the following benefits provided by the TRIP intervention: 1) increased networking and connections for navigators across clinical sites (Cosmopolitanism), 2) formalization of the patient navigation process (Goals and Purpose, Access to Knowledge and Information, and Relative Advantage), and 3) flexibility within the TRIP intervention that allowed for diversity in implementation and use of TRIP components across sites (Adaptability). Barriers included those related to documentation requirements (Complexity) and the structured patient follow up guidelines that did not always align with the timeline of existing site navigation processes (Relative Priority). Conclusions: Our analysis provides data using real-world experience from an intervention trial in progress, identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing an evidence-based patient navigation intervention for breast cancer care. We identified core processes that facilitated the navigators' patient-focused tasks and role on the clinical team. Barriers encountered reflect limitations of navigator funding models and high caseload.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes Through Patient Navigation
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (12) : 1193 - 1194
  • [42] PATIENT PERCEPTIONS OF OSTEOPOROSIS MANAGEMENT PATIENT ADVISORY GROUP: A QUALITATIVE PILOT STUDY
    Javier, R. M.
    Debiais, F.
    Alliot-Launois, F.
    Bosgiraud, P.
    Poivret, D.
    Halbout, P.
    Reginster, J. Y.
    Cortet, B.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 35 : S258 - S259
  • [43] Patient involvement for improved patient safety: A qualitative study of nurses' perceptions and experiences
    Skagerstrom, Janna
    Ericsson, Carin
    Nilsen, Per
    Ekstedt, Mirjam
    Schildmeijer, Kristina
    NURSING OPEN, 2017, 4 (04): : 230 - 239
  • [44] Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study
    Chudyk A.M.
    Stoddard R.
    McCleary N.
    Duhamel T.A.
    Shimmin C.
    Hickes S.
    Schultz A.S.H.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)
  • [45] Patient perceptions of osteoporosis management: a qualitative pilot study by a patient advisory group
    R. M. Javier
    F. Debiais
    F. Alliot-Launois
    D. Poivret
    P. Bosgiraud
    F. Barbe
    M. Bouyssié
    M. Devert
    F. Roux
    M. P. Sacchi
    S. Sirot
    P. Halbout
    T. Chevalley
    J. Y. Reginster
    B. Cortet
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 20 (1)
  • [46] European hospital managers' perceptions of patient-centred care A qualitative study on implementation and context
    Taylor, Angelina
    Groene, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (06) : 711 - 728
  • [47] An examination of the implementation of a navigation patient navigation program to improve breast and cervical cancer screening rates of Chinese immigrant women
    Lewis-Thames, Marquita W.
    Tom, Laura S.
    Leung, Ivy S.
    Yang, Anna
    Simon, Melissa A.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [48] Hip and Knee Replacement Patients' Experiences With an Orthopaedic Patient Navigator A Qualitative Study
    Teng, Larissa J.
    Goldsmith, Laurie J.
    Sawhney, Monakshi
    Jussaume, Linda
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2021, 40 (05) : 292 - 298
  • [49] Patient- and Team-Level Characteristics Associated with Handoff Protocol Fidelity in a Hybrid Implementation Study: Results from a Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Lane-Fall, Meghan B.
    Koilor, Christopher B.
    Givan, Kathleen
    Klaiman, Tamar
    Barg, Frances K.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2023, 49 (08): : 356 - 364
  • [50] Quality of Breast Cancer Care in a Boston Area Patient Navigator Program.
    Raj, A.
    Ko, N.
    Battaglia, T.
    Moy, B.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71