Patient navigator team perceptions on the implementation of a citywide breast cancer patient navigation protocol: a qualitative study

被引:7
|
作者
Loo, Stephanie [1 ]
Mullikin, Katelyn [2 ,3 ]
Robbins, Charlotte [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Victoria [2 ,3 ]
Battaglia, Tracy A. [2 ,3 ]
Lemon, Stephenie C. [4 ]
Gunn, Christine [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Med Ctr, Womens Hlth Unit, Sect Gen Internal Med, Evans Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Chan Med Sch, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[5] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[6] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Dartmouth Canc Ctr, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient navigation; Breast cancer care; Social risk screenings; CFIR; IMPACT; DISPARITIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08090-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In 2018 Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP), an evidence-based patient navigation intervention aimed at addressing breast cancer care disparities, was implemented across six Boston hospitals. This study assesses patient navigator team member perspectives regarding implementation barriers and facilitators one year post-study implementation. Methods: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews at the six sites participating in the pragmatic TRIP trial from December 2019 to March 2021. Navigation team members involved with breast cancer care navigation processes at each site were interviewed at least 12 months after intervention implementation. Interview questions were designed to address domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), focusing on barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention that included 1) rigorous 11-step guidelines for navigation, 2) a shared patient registry and 3) a social risk screening and referral program. Analysis was structured using deductive codes representing domains and constructs within CFIR. Results: Seventeen interviews were conducted with patient navigators, their supervisors, and designated clinical champions. Participants identified the following benefits provided by the TRIP intervention: 1) increased networking and connections for navigators across clinical sites (Cosmopolitanism), 2) formalization of the patient navigation process (Goals and Purpose, Access to Knowledge and Information, and Relative Advantage), and 3) flexibility within the TRIP intervention that allowed for diversity in implementation and use of TRIP components across sites (Adaptability). Barriers included those related to documentation requirements (Complexity) and the structured patient follow up guidelines that did not always align with the timeline of existing site navigation processes (Relative Priority). Conclusions: Our analysis provides data using real-world experience from an intervention trial in progress, identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing an evidence-based patient navigation intervention for breast cancer care. We identified core processes that facilitated the navigators' patient-focused tasks and role on the clinical team. Barriers encountered reflect limitations of navigator funding models and high caseload.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of patient navigation to reduce cancer health disparities in Latina breast cancer survivors
    Ramirez, Amelie G.
    Munoz, Edgar
    Stoerkel, Erika L.
    Sintes-Yallen, Amanda
    Holden, Alan E. C.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (03)
  • [22] Impact of patient navigation on breast cancer outcomes
    Haideri, N. A.
    Moormeier, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [23] Patient Navigation and the Quality of Breast Cancer Care
    Weber, Joseph
    Mascarenhas, Debra
    Bellin, Lisa
    Raab, Rachel
    Wong, Jan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : 115 - 116
  • [24] Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer A Systematic Review
    Robinson-White, Stephanie
    Conroy, Brenna
    Slavish, Kathleen H.
    Rosenzweig, Margaret
    CANCER NURSING, 2010, 33 (02) : 127 - 140
  • [25] Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study
    Hamilton, D. W.
    Heaven, B.
    Thomson, R. G.
    Wilson, J. A.
    Exley, C.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [26] Cancer patient experience with navigation service in an urban hospital setting: a qualitative study
    Conn, L. Gotlib
    Mobilio, M. Hammond
    Rotstein, O. D.
    Blacker, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2016, 25 (01) : 132 - 140
  • [27] Development of a workflow process mapping protocol to inform the implementation of regional patient navigation programs in breast oncology
    Casanova, Nicole L.
    LeClair, Amy M.
    Xiao, Victoria
    Mullikin, Katelyn R.
    Lemon, Stephenie C.
    Freund, Karen M.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Freedman, Rachel A.
    Battaglia, Tracy A.
    CANCER, 2022, 128 : 2649 - 2658
  • [28] ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas – Study protocol
    C. Allary
    A. Bourmaud
    F. Tinquaut
    M. Oriol
    J. Kalecinski
    V. Dutertre
    N. Lechopier
    M. Pommier
    Y. Benoist
    S. Rousseau
    V. Regnier
    V. Buthion
    F. Chauvin
    BMC Cancer, 16
  • [29] ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas - Study protocol
    Allary, C.
    Bourmaud, A.
    Tinquaut, F.
    Oriol, M.
    Kalecinski, J.
    Dutertre, V.
    Lechopier, N.
    Pommier, M.
    Benoist, Y.
    Rousseau, S.
    Regnier, V.
    Buthion, V.
    Chauvin, F.
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [30] An Exploration of the Patient Navigator Role: Perspectives of Younger Women With Breast Cancer
    Pedersen, Allison E.
    Hack, Thomas F.
    McClement, Susan E.
    Taylor-Brown, Jill
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (01) : 77 - 88