Impact of Abdominal Complications on Outcome After Mechanical Circulatory Support

被引:21
|
作者
Bhama, Jay K. [1 ]
Rayappa, Steven
Zaldonis, Diana
Adusumilli, Prasad S.
Bansal, Aditya
Genovese, Elizabeth A.
Teuteberg, Jeffrey J.
Toyoda, Yoshiya
Siegenthaler, Michael P.
Bermudez, Christian A.
McCurry, Kenneth R.
Kormos, Robert L.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div Cardiac Surg, Dept Surg,Heart Lung & Esophageal Surg Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2010年 / 89卷 / 02期
关键词
VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.11.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is life sustaining for patients with end-stage heart failure. Most devices require abdominal wall transgression, creating a potential for abdominal complications. The incidence and impact of these relatively underreported complications are unknown. Methods. A retrospective review was performed on 179 patients who received MCS therapy from 1999 to 2008. Abdominal complications were grouped as abdominal wall, gastrointestinal tract, and solid organ. Results. Ninety-eight patients (55%) experienced 157 abdominal complications. These involved the abdominal wall in 69 (44%), the gastrointestinal tract in 52 (33%), and the solid organs in 36 (23%). Surgical intervention was required in 36% of patients with abdominal wall complications, 19% of patients with gastrointestinal tract complications, and 14% of patients with solid organ complications. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), emergent device placement (p = 0.019), and preimplant mechanical ventilation (p = 0.045) as independent risk factors for developing an abdominal complication. Kaplan-Meier survival while receiving MCS was significantly reduced for patients with abdominal complications versus those without (p = 0.0142). Multivariate analysis identified only solid organ abdominal complications (p = 0.001) as an independent risk factor for death while receiving device support. Conclusions. Abdominal complications are common in patients supported with MCS devices and significantly reduce survival. Surgical intervention is more frequently required for complications related to the abdominal wall compared with other complications. Patients with significant comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure) requiring urgent or emergent device placement are at higher risk for the development of abdominal complications with an attendant reduction in device-related survival. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:522-9) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 528
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mechanical circulatory support after heart transplantation
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    Jarrett, Craig M.
    Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo
    Smedira, Nicholas G.
    Nowicki, Edward R.
    Thuita, Lucy
    Mountis, Maria
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 41 (01) : 200 - 206
  • [32] Heart transplantation after mechanical circulatory support
    Buz, S
    Drews, T
    Weng, Y
    Muller, J
    Hummel, M
    Loebe, M
    Hetzer, R
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (03) : 583 - 584
  • [33] Mechanical circulatory support: Candidate selection, benefits, and potential complications
    Kfoury, AG
    Anderson, JL
    Taylor, DO
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 10 (05) : 343 - 348
  • [34] Complications of Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Patel, Harsh
    Madanieh, Raef
    Kosmas, Constantine E.
    Vatti, Satya K.
    Vittorio, Timothy J.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 9 : 15 - 21
  • [35] Lack of Improvement in Prealbumin at Two Weeks Predicts a Poor Outcome after Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Lockard, K. L.
    DeGore, L.
    Schwarm, P.
    Winowich, S.
    O'Shea, G.
    Siegenthaler, M.
    Simon, M.
    Kormos, R. L.
    Teuteberg, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (02): : S66 - S66
  • [36] Does the Type of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplant Affect Outcome after Transplant?
    Esmailian, F.
    Arabia, F.
    Czer, L.
    Kittleson, M.
    Geft, D.
    Cole, R.
    Esmailian, G.
    Rafiei, M.
    Passano, E.
    Barone, H.
    Moriguchi, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S289 - S289
  • [37] Impact of Early Major Adverse Events on Quality of Life After Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Holtz, J.
    Dew, M. A.
    McNulty, M.
    Lockard, K.
    Kunz, N.
    Dunn, E.
    Bhama, J.
    Bermudez, C.
    Shullo, M.
    Kormos, R.
    Teuteberg, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S308 - S308
  • [38] Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht
    S. E. A. Felix
    F. Z. Ramjankhan
    M. P. Buijsrogge
    K. A. Jacob
    F. W. Asselbergs
    M. I. F. Oerlemans
    J. H. Kirkels
    L. W. van Laake
    A. M. C. Oppelaar
    W. J. L. Suyker
    N. de Jonge
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2020, 28 : 210 - 218
  • [39] Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht
    Felix, S. E. A.
    Ramjankhan, F. Z.
    Buijsrogge, M. P.
    Jacob, K. A.
    Asselbergs, F. W.
    Oerlemans, M. I. F.
    Kirkels, J. H.
    van Laake, L. W.
    Oppelaar, A. M. C.
    Suyker, W. J. L.
    de Jonge, N.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (04) : 210 - 218
  • [40] The impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support strategies on thrombocytopenia
    Dwaah, Henry
    Jain, Nupur
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Ortoleva, Jamel P.
    Chweich, Haval
    Couper, Gregory S.
    Kawabori, Masashi
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 73