Impact of Abdominal Complications on Outcome After Mechanical Circulatory Support

被引:21
|
作者
Bhama, Jay K. [1 ]
Rayappa, Steven
Zaldonis, Diana
Adusumilli, Prasad S.
Bansal, Aditya
Genovese, Elizabeth A.
Teuteberg, Jeffrey J.
Toyoda, Yoshiya
Siegenthaler, Michael P.
Bermudez, Christian A.
McCurry, Kenneth R.
Kormos, Robert L.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div Cardiac Surg, Dept Surg,Heart Lung & Esophageal Surg Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2010年 / 89卷 / 02期
关键词
VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.11.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is life sustaining for patients with end-stage heart failure. Most devices require abdominal wall transgression, creating a potential for abdominal complications. The incidence and impact of these relatively underreported complications are unknown. Methods. A retrospective review was performed on 179 patients who received MCS therapy from 1999 to 2008. Abdominal complications were grouped as abdominal wall, gastrointestinal tract, and solid organ. Results. Ninety-eight patients (55%) experienced 157 abdominal complications. These involved the abdominal wall in 69 (44%), the gastrointestinal tract in 52 (33%), and the solid organs in 36 (23%). Surgical intervention was required in 36% of patients with abdominal wall complications, 19% of patients with gastrointestinal tract complications, and 14% of patients with solid organ complications. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), emergent device placement (p = 0.019), and preimplant mechanical ventilation (p = 0.045) as independent risk factors for developing an abdominal complication. Kaplan-Meier survival while receiving MCS was significantly reduced for patients with abdominal complications versus those without (p = 0.0142). Multivariate analysis identified only solid organ abdominal complications (p = 0.001) as an independent risk factor for death while receiving device support. Conclusions. Abdominal complications are common in patients supported with MCS devices and significantly reduce survival. Surgical intervention is more frequently required for complications related to the abdominal wall compared with other complications. Patients with significant comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure) requiring urgent or emergent device placement are at higher risk for the development of abdominal complications with an attendant reduction in device-related survival. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:522-9) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 528
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DOES SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS IMPACT OUTCOME FOLLOWING MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICE IMPLANTATION?
    Ching, K.
    Aintablian, T.
    Hamilton, M.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 65 (01) : 200 - 201
  • [22] Outcome of the Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Prendergast, Thomas
    Stockmaster, Neil
    Goodman, Andrew
    Lozane, Ann Marie
    Batsides, George
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 8 (01) : 12 - 16
  • [23] Race by Gender after Mechanical Circulatory Support: Impact on Survival and Adverse Events
    Teuteberg, J. J.
    Pamboukian, S.
    Lee, S.
    Tatooles, A.
    Hiesinger, W.
    Milano, C.
    McGee, E.
    Cotts, W.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S424 - S425
  • [24] Impact of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Posttransplant Outcomes
    Dardas, Todd F.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2018, 36 (04) : 551 - +
  • [25] Outcome Of The Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Stockmaster, Neil
    Prenderg, Thomas
    Lozane, Ann Marie
    Anderson, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B111 - B112
  • [26] Recurrent thrombosis after mechanical circulatory support
    Aissaoui, Nadia
    Hakim-Meibodi, Kavus
    Morshuis, Michiel
    Gummert, Jan
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (05) : 668 - 669
  • [27] NEONATAL HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA AFTER MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT
    Bhombal, S.
    Dasani, R.
    Davis, A.
    Axelrod, D. M.
    Wong, R. J.
    Bhutani, V. K.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (01) : 164 - 165
  • [28] Nuclear Remodeling After Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Luo Jun
    Farris, Stephen
    Helterline, Deri
    Stempien-Otero, April
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 121
  • [29] Heart transplantation after mechanical circulatory support
    Wang, SS
    Chou, NK
    Hsu, RB
    Chen, YS
    Ko, WJ
    Chu, SH
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (07) : 1527 - 1528
  • [30] The impact of abdominal complications on the outcome after thoracic transplantation—a single center experience
    K. Timrott
    F. W. R. Vondran
    M. Kleine
    G. Warnecke
    A. Haverich
    F. Lehner
    J. Klempnauer
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2014, 399 : 789 - 793