Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region

被引:9
|
作者
van Leeuwen, B. J. [1 ]
Dijkstra, P. U. [2 ,3 ]
Dieters, J. A. [1 ]
Verbeek, H. P. J. [1 ]
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ren, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Med Fac, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Campus Salemba,Jalan Salemba Raya 4, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
关键词
Cone-beam computed tomography; Dehiscence; Fenestration; Accuracy; Reliability; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; ALVEOLAR BONE DEHISCENCES; MANDIBULAR INCISORS; ACCURACY; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. Materials and methods Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. Results The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 +/- 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 +/- 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 +/- 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 +/- 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (- 0.1 beta, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 beta, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. Conclusions CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT.
引用
收藏
页码:5663 / 5672
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography
    Shiratori, Lucy Naomi
    Marotti, Juliana
    Yamanouchi, Julio
    Chilvarquer, Israel
    Contin, Ivo
    Tortamano-Neto, Pedro
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [42] The effects of voxel size on cone beam computed tomography images of the temporomandibular joints
    Lukat, Trish D.
    Perschbacher, Susanne E.
    Pharoah, Michael J.
    Lam, Ernest W. N.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 119 (02): : 229 - 237
  • [43] Accuracy of Linear Measurements in Cone Beam Computed Tomography With Different Voxel Sizes
    Gomes Torres, Marianna Guanaes
    Flores Campos, Paulo Sergio
    Neto Segundo, Nilson Pena
    Navarro, Marcus
    Crusoe-Rebello, Ieda
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [44] Method of visualisation influences accuracy of measurements in cone-beam computed tomography
    Patcas, Raphael
    Angst, Christine
    Kellenberger, Christian J.
    Schaetzle, Marc A.
    Ullrich, Oliver
    Markic, Goran
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (07) : 1277 - 1283
  • [45] Evaluation of the anatomical measurements of the temporomandibular joint by cone-beam computed tomography
    Ocak, M.
    Sargon, M. F.
    Orhan, K.
    Bilecenoglu, B.
    Geneci, F.
    Uzuner, M. B.
    FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2019, 78 (01) : 174 - 181
  • [47] Entrance surface dose distribution and organ dose assessment for cone-beam computed tomography using measurements and Monte Carlo simulations with voxel phantoms
    Baptista, M.
    Di Maria, S.
    Vieira, S.
    Vaz, P.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 428 - 434
  • [48] Morphometric Characterization of Anterior Maxillary Alveolar Ridge by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Fuentes, Ramon
    Navarro, Pablo
    Salamanca, Carlos
    Cantin, Mario
    Garay, Ivonne
    Flores, Tania
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2014, 32 (02): : 493 - 498
  • [49] Investigation the anterior mandibular lingual concavity by using cone-beam computed tomography
    Citir, M.
    Gunduz, K.
    Kasap, P.
    FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2021, 80 (04) : 916 - 922
  • [50] Effect of Voxel Size on Detection of External Root Resorption Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
    Nikneshan, Sima
    Valizadeh, Solmaz
    Javanmard, Anahita
    Alibakhshi, Leila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (03)