Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region

被引:9
|
作者
van Leeuwen, B. J. [1 ]
Dijkstra, P. U. [2 ,3 ]
Dieters, J. A. [1 ]
Verbeek, H. P. J. [1 ]
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ren, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Med Fac, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Campus Salemba,Jalan Salemba Raya 4, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
关键词
Cone-beam computed tomography; Dehiscence; Fenestration; Accuracy; Reliability; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; ALVEOLAR BONE DEHISCENCES; MANDIBULAR INCISORS; ACCURACY; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. Materials and methods Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. Results The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 +/- 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 +/- 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 +/- 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 +/- 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (- 0.1 beta, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 beta, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. Conclusions CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT.
引用
收藏
页码:5663 / 5672
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements
    Baumgaertel, Sebastian
    Palomo, J. Martin
    Palomo, Leena
    Hans, Mark G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [32] The influence of the field of view and voxel size on the contrast-to-noise ratio in cone-beam computed tomography imaging
    Ozer, Nezaket Ezgi
    Ulusoy, Ali Canberk
    Ilhan, Betul
    Lindfors, Ninita
    Boyacioglu, Hayal
    Grondahl, Hans-Goran
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [33] Influence of voxel size and filter type on detecting vertical root fracture using cone-beam computed tomography
    Kolsuz, Mehmet Eray
    Evli, Cengiz
    Aksoy, Umut
    Koohnavard, Mehrdad
    Aksoy, Secil
    Orhan, Kaan
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2023, 49 : 439 - 446
  • [34] Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images
    Wood, Ryan
    Sun, Zongyang
    Chaudhry, Jahanzeb
    Tee, Boon Ching
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    Leblebicioglu, Binnaz
    England, Greg
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 143 (03) : 353 - 363
  • [35] Cone beam computed tomography devices in the evaluation of buccal bone in anterior teeth
    Dantas, L. L.
    Ferreira, P. P.
    Oliveira, L. S. A. F.
    Neves, F. S.
    Campos, P. S. F.
    Scarfe, W. C.
    Crusoe-Rebello, I.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 64 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [36] Effects of the cone-beam computed tomography protocol on the accuracy and image quality of root surface area measurements: An in vitro study
    Intarasuksanti, Chanikarn
    Prapayasatok, Sangsom
    Kampan, Natnicha
    Sirabanchongkran, Supassara
    Mahakkanukrauh, Pasuk
    Sastraruji, Thanapat
    Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
    Kuharattanachai, Kachaphol
    Tripuwabhrut, Kanich
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2023, 53 (04) : 325 - 333
  • [37] Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: Effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose
    Librizzi, Zachary T.
    Tadinada, Aditya S.
    Valiyaparambil, Jayasanker V.
    Lurie, Alan G.
    Mallya, Sanjay M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (01) : E25 - E30
  • [38] Buccal bifurcation cyst (paradental cyst) defined by ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography
    Gözde Derindağ
    Özkan Miloğlu
    Muhammed Akif Sümbüllü
    Oral Radiology, 2019, 35 : 315 - 320
  • [39] Buccal bifurcation cyst (paradental cyst) defined by ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography
    Derindag, Gozde
    Miloglu, Ozkan
    Sumbullu, Muhammed Akif
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) : 315 - 320
  • [40] A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
    Akyalcin, Sercan
    Schaefer, Jeffrey S.
    English, Jeryl D.
    Stephens, Claude R.
    Winkelmann, Sam
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2013, 43 (02) : 85 - 90