Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region

被引:9
|
作者
van Leeuwen, B. J. [1 ]
Dijkstra, P. U. [2 ,3 ]
Dieters, J. A. [1 ]
Verbeek, H. P. J. [1 ]
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ren, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Med Fac, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Campus Salemba,Jalan Salemba Raya 4, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
关键词
Cone-beam computed tomography; Dehiscence; Fenestration; Accuracy; Reliability; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; ALVEOLAR BONE DEHISCENCES; MANDIBULAR INCISORS; ACCURACY; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. Materials and methods Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. Results The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 +/- 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 +/- 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 +/- 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 +/- 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (- 0.1 beta, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 beta, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. Conclusions CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT.
引用
收藏
页码:5663 / 5672
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
    B. J. van Leeuwen
    P. U. Dijkstra
    J. A. Dieters
    H. P. J. Verbeek
    A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman
    Y. Ren
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 5663 - 5672
  • [2] Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations
    Sun, Liangyan
    Zhang, Lina
    Shen, Guofang
    Wang, Bo
    Fang, Bing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 147 (03) : 313 - 323
  • [3] Evaluation of buccal bone coverage in the anterior region by cone-beam computed tomography
    Ferreira, Paula Paes
    Torres, Marianna
    Flores Campos, Paulo Sergio
    Vogel, Carlos Jorge
    de Araujo, Telma Martins
    Crusoe Rocha Rebello, Ieda Margarida
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 144 (05) : 698 - 704
  • [4] The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography
    Tanimoto, Hideyuki
    Arai, Yoshinori
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 25 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [5] The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography
    Hideyuki Tanimoto
    Yoshinori Arai
    Oral Radiology, 2009, 25 : 149 - 153
  • [6] Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations
    Leung, Cynthia C.
    Palomo, Leena
    Griffith, Richard
    Hans, Mark G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (04) : S109 - S119
  • [7] Bone dehiscences and fenestrations of the anterior mandibular facial bone wall: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study
    Pilloni, Andrea
    Rotundo, Roberto
    Gambarini, Gianluca
    Testarelli, Luca
    Dell'Olmo, Fabiola
    MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA, 2018, 67 (03): : 86 - 95
  • [8] Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements
    Molen, Aaron Dean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (04) : S130 - S135
  • [9] Stability of voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography
    Naitoh, Munetaka
    Aimiya, Hidetoshi
    Nakata, Kazuhiko
    Gotoh, Kenichi
    Ariji, Eiichiro
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 30 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [10] Stability of voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography
    Munetaka Naitoh
    Hidetoshi Aimiya
    Kazuhiko Nakata
    Kenichi Gotoh
    Eiichiro Ariji
    Oral Radiology, 2014, 30 : 147 - 152