Porosity management and control in powder bed fusion process through process-quality interactions

被引:32
|
作者
Xiao, Xinyi [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Min [2 ]
Hamilton, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Mech & Mfg Engn Dept, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Quantitative Model; Multi-dimensional Modeling; Porosity; Printable Zone; INCONEL; 718; PARAMETERS; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser Powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has gained much attention for its ability to manufacture high-precision and high-complexity metal components for the aircraft and automobile industries. However, to a certain degree, the print quality (shape, GD&T, mechanical property) is difficult to predict and control due to the multivariant processability. Recent research predominantly focuses on building a semantic/qualitative process relationship from the single/a few process parameters on the ultimate print qualities, such as thermal distortion failure/defect probabilities. However, such semantic/qualitative process relationships cannot reflect specific governing effects from process variables and provide an optimal selection of the parameters to ensure the build quality. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a quantitative model within a process network and achieve a constant quality level by controlling the process parameter set. To address the aforementioned challenges, this research focuses on developing a multi-dimensional process-quality interaction model to predict and control the porosity of Titanium 6Al-4V in L-PBF. The process network is first derived from existing literature composing the potential, influential process parameters that can deviate the porosity level, such as laser power and scanning speed. Then the quantitative model is built based on a multi-dimensional quantitative modeling technique from a collection of experimental data. The multi-dimensional modeling provides an architecture that replaces the artificial neural network (ANN) or regression model to depict the mathematical relationship. The established quantitative process models analyze the intercorrelated effects from process parameters to the porosity. The printable zone can also be derived from such a quantitative model and visualized through a multi-dimension variable-control response graph to optimize the selection of process parameters. This would result in a comprehensive understanding of selecting the process parameters according to the desired porosity level and pave the path to fully control the metal L-PBF print qualities by adjusting the process variables. The experimental data also validate the proposed quantitative model to demonstrate its effectiveness and correctness.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advantages of Injection Mold with Hybrid Process of Metal Powder Bed Fusion and Subtractive Process
    Abe, Satoshi
    Uemoto, Seiichi
    Morimoto, Masanori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 17 (04) : 388 - 397
  • [42] Process Development for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of pure Copper
    Stoll, Thomas
    Trautnitz, Pascal
    Schmiedeke, Samuel
    Franke, Joerg
    Travitzky, Nahum
    LASER 3D MANUFACTURING VII, 2020, 11271
  • [43] Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process and Structure Data Set for Process Model Validations
    Nathaniel Wood
    Edwin Schwalbach
    Andrew Gillman
    David J. Hoelzle
    Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 2023, 12 : 493 - 501
  • [44] The process planning for additive and subtractive hybrid manufacturing of powder bed fusion (PBF) process
    Wang, Yin
    Chen, Yukai
    Wen, Chuyue
    Huang, Ke
    Chen, Zhen
    Han, Bin
    Zhang, Qi
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 227
  • [45] Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process and Structure Data Set for Process Model Validations
    Wood, Nathaniel
    Schwalbach, Edwin
    Gillman, Andrew
    Hoelzle, David J.
    INTEGRATING MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING INNOVATION, 2023, 12 (04) : 493 - 501
  • [46] Acoustic emission monitoring of a laser powder bed fusion process
    Jüngert, Anne
    Thenikl, Thomas
    Hofmann, Roman
    Maderner, Ludwig
    Werz, Martin
    e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2024, 29 (10):
  • [47] Investigation of the accuracy and roughness in the laser powder bed fusion process
    Calignano, F.
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2018, 13 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [48] Compatibility of tool geometry and process parameters in powder bed fusion
    Gao, Xiang
    Zhang, Lichao
    Zhang, Zhao
    COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS, 2025, 12 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [49] Backscatter absorption spectroscopy for process monitoring in powder bed fusion
    Beuting, Matthias
    Fairhall, Alex J.
    Goldsmith, Randall H.
    Chen, Lianyi
    Sanders, Scott T.
    OPTICS CONTINUUM, 2024, 3 (08): : 1423 - 1437
  • [50] Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion
    Tang, Ming
    Pistorius, P. Chris
    Beuth, Jack L.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2017, 14 : 39 - 48