Porosity management and control in powder bed fusion process through process-quality interactions

被引:32
|
作者
Xiao, Xinyi [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Min [2 ]
Hamilton, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Mech & Mfg Engn Dept, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Quantitative Model; Multi-dimensional Modeling; Porosity; Printable Zone; INCONEL; 718; PARAMETERS; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser Powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has gained much attention for its ability to manufacture high-precision and high-complexity metal components for the aircraft and automobile industries. However, to a certain degree, the print quality (shape, GD&T, mechanical property) is difficult to predict and control due to the multivariant processability. Recent research predominantly focuses on building a semantic/qualitative process relationship from the single/a few process parameters on the ultimate print qualities, such as thermal distortion failure/defect probabilities. However, such semantic/qualitative process relationships cannot reflect specific governing effects from process variables and provide an optimal selection of the parameters to ensure the build quality. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a quantitative model within a process network and achieve a constant quality level by controlling the process parameter set. To address the aforementioned challenges, this research focuses on developing a multi-dimensional process-quality interaction model to predict and control the porosity of Titanium 6Al-4V in L-PBF. The process network is first derived from existing literature composing the potential, influential process parameters that can deviate the porosity level, such as laser power and scanning speed. Then the quantitative model is built based on a multi-dimensional quantitative modeling technique from a collection of experimental data. The multi-dimensional modeling provides an architecture that replaces the artificial neural network (ANN) or regression model to depict the mathematical relationship. The established quantitative process models analyze the intercorrelated effects from process parameters to the porosity. The printable zone can also be derived from such a quantitative model and visualized through a multi-dimension variable-control response graph to optimize the selection of process parameters. This would result in a comprehensive understanding of selecting the process parameters according to the desired porosity level and pave the path to fully control the metal L-PBF print qualities by adjusting the process variables. The experimental data also validate the proposed quantitative model to demonstrate its effectiveness and correctness.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tolerancing the laser powder bed fusion process based on machine capability measures with the aim of process control
    Maurer, Oliver
    Herter, Franziska
    Bahre, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 80 : 659 - 665
  • [22] Dimensionless Enthalpy as Characteristic Factor for Process Control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Hanemann, Theresa
    Seyfert, Christoph
    Holfelder, Peter
    Rota, Astrid
    Heilmaier, Martin
    JOURNAL OF LASER MICRO NANOENGINEERING, 2020, 15 (03): : 257 - 266
  • [24] Process characterization and analysis of ceramic powder bed fusion
    Kevin Florio
    Dario Puccio
    Giorgio Viganò
    Stefan Pfeiffer
    Fabrizio Verga
    Marco Grasso
    Bianca Maria Colosimo
    Thomas Graule
    Konrad Wegener
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 117 : 2105 - 2116
  • [25] Dust Particle Counter for Powder Bed Fusion Process
    Karcz, Stanislaw
    Skrabalak, Grzegorz
    Brudnik, Andrzej
    Gajoch, Grzegorz
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (19)
  • [26] A framework for the optimization of powder-bed fusion process
    Ravichander, Bharath Bhushan
    Favela, Carolina
    Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam
    Moghaddam, Narges Shayesteh
    BEHAVIOR AND MECHANICS OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS XV, 2021, 11589
  • [27] Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: An overview
    Singh, Riya
    Gupta, Akash
    Tripathi, Ojestez
    Srivastava, Sashank
    Singh, Bharat
    Awasthi, Ankita
    Rajput, S. K.
    Sonia, Pankaj
    Singhal, Piyush
    Saxena, Kuldeep K.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 26 : 3058 - 3070
  • [28] Process characterization and analysis of ceramic powder bed fusion
    Florio, Kevin
    Puccio, Dario
    Vigano, Giorgio
    Pfeiffer, Stefan
    Verga, Fabrizio
    Grasso, Marco
    Colosimo, Bianca Maria
    Graule, Thomas
    Wegener, Konrad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 117 (7-8): : 2105 - 2116
  • [29] Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process
    Acharya, Ranadip
    Sharon, John A.
    Staroselsky, Alexander
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2017, 124 : 360 - 371
  • [30] In-process and post-process strategies for part quality assessment in metal powder bed fusion: A review
    Chua, Cherq
    Liu, Yanting
    Williams, Richard J.
    Chua, Chee Kai
    Sing, Swee Leong
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2024, 73 : 75 - 105