HOW SHOULD WE REGULATE HERITABLE HUMAN GENOME EDITING IN AUSTRALIA?

被引:0
|
作者
Nicol, Dianne [1 ]
Rudge, Christopher [2 ]
Paxton, Rebecca [3 ]
Niemeyer, Simon [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Law, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Hobart, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Ctr Deliberat Democracy & Global Governance, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
heritable human genome editing; governance of genome editing; embryo research; mitochondrial donation; citizens' jury; DELIBERATION; DEMOCRACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Heritable human genome editing is a form of modification of the human genome that will be inherited by progeny of the person whose DNA has been edited. Editing human genomes in ways that are heritable is currently prohibited in many countries throughout the world, including in Australia. This section starts with an examination of the historical backdrop to Australia's current laws relating to heritable human genome editing, with particular focus on how technological advances and community responses have shaped our legislative environment for innovative artificial reproductive technologies. The section then examines how community responses to current developments in heritable human genome editing might shape future law reform. The aim is to provide a foundation for examining how the future regulatory environment for heritable human genome editing in Australia might be shaped in ways that are responsive both to technological developments and to contemporary ethical norms and social values.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 336
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?
    Halpern, Jodi
    O'Hara, Sharon E.
    Doxzen, Kevin W.
    Witkowsy, Lea B.
    Owen, Aleksa L.
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (05): : 293 - 298
  • [43] Point of view: How should the applications of genome editing be assessed and regulated?
    Fears, Robin
    Ter Meulen, Volker
    ELIFE, 2017, 6
  • [44] Should we use CRISPR gene editing in human embryos?
    Kubikova, Nada
    Keefe, David L.
    Wells, Dagan
    Oktay, Kutluk H.
    Feinberg, Eve C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : 737 - 744
  • [45] Heritable Genome Editing Not Ready for the Clinic, Panel Says
    Abbasi, Jennifer
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (14): : 1386 - 1386
  • [46] Heritable Genome Editing: Who Speaks for "Future" Children?
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Kleiderman, Erika
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (05): : 285 - 292
  • [47] Heritable human genome editing is 'currently not permitted', but it is no longer 'prohibited': so says the ISSCR
    Baylis, Francoise
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 49 (05) : 319 - 321
  • [49] Heritable human genome editing: Research progress, ethical considerations, and hurdles to clinical practice
    Turocy, Jenna
    Adashi, Eli Y.
    Egli, Dieter
    CELL, 2021, 184 (06) : 1561 - 1574
  • [50] Response to Levrier re: Human Germline and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape
    Darnovsky, Marcy
    Hasson, Katie
    Krahn, Timothy M.
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2021, 4 (01): : 4 - 5