HOW SHOULD WE REGULATE HERITABLE HUMAN GENOME EDITING IN AUSTRALIA?

被引：0

作者：

Nicol, Dianne ^{[1
]}

Rudge, Christopher ^{[2
]}

Paxton, Rebecca ^{[3
]}

Niemeyer, Simon ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Law, Hobart, Tas, Australia

[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[3] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Hobart, Australia

[4] Univ Canberra, Ctr Deliberat Democracy & Global Governance, Canberra, ACT, Australia

来源：

JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE | 2022年 / 29卷 / 02期

关键词：

heritable human genome editing; governance of genome editing; embryo research; mitochondrial donation; citizens' jury; DELIBERATION; DEMOCRACY;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

Heritable human genome editing is a form of modification of the human genome that will be inherited by progeny of the person whose DNA has been edited. Editing human genomes in ways that are heritable is currently prohibited in many countries throughout the world, including in Australia. This section starts with an examination of the historical backdrop to Australia's current laws relating to heritable human genome editing, with particular focus on how technological advances and community responses have shaped our legislative environment for innovative artificial reproductive technologies. The section then examines how community responses to current developments in heritable human genome editing might shape future law reform. The aim is to provide a foundation for examining how the future regulatory environment for heritable human genome editing in Australia might be shaped in ways that are responsive both to technological developments and to contemporary ethical norms and social values.

引用

页码：322 / 336

页数：15

共 50 条

[21] Making sense of heritable human genome editing: Scientific and ethical considerations
Greenfield, Andy
CURING GENETIC DISEASES THROUGH GENOME REPROGRAMMING, 2021, 182 : 1 - 28
[22] Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does it Mean and What Should it Mean?
Iltis, Ana S.
Hoover, Sarah
Matthews, Kirstin R. W.
FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 3
[23] A golden opportunity for South Africa to legislate on human heritable genome editing
Thaldar, D. W.
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS AND LAW, 2023, 16 (03) : 91 - 94
[24] Re: Human Germline and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape
Levrier, Guillaume
CRISPR JOURNAL, 2021, 4 (01): : 3 - 4
[25] Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
Ross, Christian H.
SPONTANEOUS GENERATIONS-JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2022, 10 (01): : 62 - 87
[26] Mapping the ‘Ethical’ Controversy of Human Heritable Genome Editing: a Multidisciplinary Approach
Richard Pougnet
Benjamin Derbez
Marie-Bérengère Troadec
Asian Bioethics Review, 2023, 15 : 189 - 204
[27] Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing
Rueda, Jon
Segers, Seppe
Hopster, Jeroen
Kudlek, Karolina
Liedo, Belen
Marchiori, Samuela
Danaher, John
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024,
[28] Mapping the 'Ethical' Controversy of Human Heritable Genome Editing: a Multidisciplinary Approach
Pougnet, Richard
Derbez, Benjamin
Troadec, Marie-Berengere
ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2023, 15 (02) : 189 - 204
[29] Governing Heritable Human Genome Editing: A Textual History and a Proposal for the Future
Walters, LeRoy
Cook-Deegan, Robert M.
Adashi, Eli Y.
CRISPR JOURNAL, 2021, 4 (04): : 469 - 476
[30] How should we test for nonsevere heritable platelet function disorders?
Norman, J. E.
Westbury, S. K.
Jones, M. L.
Mumford, A. D.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 36 (03) : 326 - 333

← 1 2 3 4 5 →