Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: A prospective clinical and radiographic study

被引:40
|
作者
Villarinho, Eduardo Aydos [1 ]
Triches, Diego Fernandes [1 ]
Alonso, Fernando Rizzo [1 ]
Mendonca Mezzomo, Luis Andre [2 ]
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim [1 ]
Arai Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS, Sch Dent, Ave Ipiranga 6681,Predio 6, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Sch Dent, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
crown-to-implant ratio; dental implants; peri-implant bone loss; prospective clinical study; prosthetic complications; short implants; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE LOSS; LESS-THAN-10; MM; SURVIVAL; RATES; RATIO; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATIONS; METAANALYSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12494
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of short implants is still not a consensus for challenging clinical situations, such as unfavorable crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. PurposeThis prospective study evaluated the rates of prosthetic complications and implant failure, the mean marginal bone loss of 6-mm dental implants with single crowns in posterior regions and the potential risk factors. Materials and MethodsForty-six dental implants, 6-mm long and 4.1-mm wide, were placed in the posterior region in 20 patients. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined after the restoration with single crowns and on a yearly basis. Potential risk factors (arch, bruxism, maximum bite force, anatomical and clinical C/I ratios, and occlusal table area) were analyzed according to the following outcomes: implant survival, bone loss, and prosthetic complications. ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 459 (16-57) months. There was no early loss of implants. After prosthetic loading, 4 implants were lost (2 in the mandible and 2 in the maxilla; 91.3% survival), and there were 13 prosthetic complications (28.3%), yielding a 65.2% success rate. The frailty term showed a 95% greater chance of loss in the mandible than the maxilla. Mean peri-implant bone loss was of 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in the first, second, third, and fourth years, respectively, with a mean cumulative loss of 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm at 48 months. In the multilevel model, the effects of the clinical C/I ratio and time were significant for bone loss (P<.001). It was estimated that a mean bone loss of 0.1 mm is associated with both a one-unit increase in time (12 months) and a 0.1 increase in the clinical C/I ratio. The other potential risk factors showed no significant relationship with the outcomes. ConclusionsThe 6-mm implants supporting single crowns performed well, but the mandible shows a higher risk of failure. The time and clinical C/I ratio are predictors for bone loss.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jun-Yu Shi
    Ying-Xin Gu
    Shi-Chong Qiao
    Long-Fei Zhuang
    Xiao-Meng Zhang
    Hong-Chang Lai
    [J]. Trials, 16
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Gu, Ying-Xin
    Qiao, Shi-Chong
    Zhuang, Long-Fei
    Zhang, Xiao-Meng
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [24] Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns - a prospective 5-year cohort study
    Rossi, Fabio
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Ricci, Emanuele
    Ferraioli, Lorenzo
    Marchetti, Claudio
    Botticelli, Daniele
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (04) : 471 - 477
  • [25] A retrospective clinical study of single short implants (less than 8 mm) in posterior edentulous areas
    Kim, Sang-Yun
    Ku, Jeong-Kui
    Kim, Hyun-Suk
    Yun, Pil-Young
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 10 (03): : 191 - 196
  • [26] Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sahrmann, P.
    Naenni, N.
    Jung, R. E.
    Hammerle, C. H. F.
    Attin, T.
    Schmidlin, P. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 102 (09) : 1015 - 1021
  • [27] Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    Si, Mi-Si
    Zhuang, Long-Fei
    Shen, Hui
    Liu, Yue-lian
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (02) : 230 - 237
  • [28] A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6 mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading
    Mustafa Ayna
    Bastian Wessing
    Ralf Gutwald
    Andreas Neff
    Thomas Ziebart
    Yahya Açil
    Jörg Wiltfang
    Aydin Gülses
    [J]. Odontology, 2019, 107 : 244 - 253
  • [29] Implant Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss of 6-mm Short Implants: A 2-Year Clinical Report
    Bratu, Emanuel
    Chan, Hsun-Liang
    Mihali, Sorin
    Karancsi, Olimpiu
    Bratu, Dana Cristina
    Fu, Jia-Hui
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (06) : 1425 - 1428
  • [30] Survival rates of ultra-short (&lt;6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study
    Lombardo, Giorgio
    Signoriello, Annarita
    Marincola, Mauro
    Liboni, Pietro
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Nocini, Pier F.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (06) : 904 - 919