Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in ACL-replacement with a patellar tendon graft: Interference screw versus staple fixation in human knees

被引:4
|
作者
Gerich, TG [1 ]
Cassim, A [1 ]
Lattermann, C [1 ]
Lobenhoffer, HP [1 ]
Tscherne, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Hsch Hannover, Unfallchirurg Klin, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 1998年 / 101卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; patellar tendon transplant; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1007/s001130050255
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The endoscopic single incision technique for ACL reconstruction with a femoral half-tunnel may lead to a graft/tunnel mismatch and subsequent protrusion of the block from the tibial tunnel. The typical tibial fixation with an interference screw is not possible in these cases. Fixation with staples in a bony groove inferior to the tunnel outlet can be used as an alternative technique. Current literature does not provide biomechanical data of bath fixation techniques in a human model. This study was performed to evaluate primary biomechanical parameters of this technique compared to a standard interference screw fixation of the block. 55 fresh-frozen human cadaver knee joints of a younger age (mean age: 44 years) were used. Grafts were harvested from the patellar tendon midportion with bone blocks of 25 mm length and 9 mm width. A 10 mm tibial tunnel was drilled from the anteromedial cortex to the center of the tibial insertion of the ACL. 3 different sizes of interference screws (7 x 30, 9 x 20 and 9 x 30 mm) were chosen as a standard control procedure (n = 40). For tibial bone-block fixation the graft was placed through the tunnel, the screw was then inserted on the cancellous or the cortical surface respectively. 15 knees were used far staple fixation. A groove was created inferior to the tunnel outlet with a chisel. The bone block was fixed in this groove with 2 barbed stainless steel staples. Tensile testing in both of the groups was carried out under axial load parallel to the tibial tunnel in a Zwick-testing-machine with a Velocity of 1 mm/sec. Dislocation of the graft and stiffness were calculated at 175 N load. Maximum load to failure using interference screws varied between 506 and 758 N. load to failure using staples was 588 N. Dislocation of the graft ranged between 3.6 and 4.7 mm for interference screw fixation and was 4.2 mm for staples. With both fixation techniques, the recorded failure loads were sufficient to withstand the graft loads which are to be expected during the rehabilitation period. Staple fixation of the bone block outside of the tunnel resulted in fixation strength comparable to interference screw fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 208
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioabsorbable interference screw versus bioabsorbable cross pins: influence of femoral graft fixation on the clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction
    Stephan Frosch
    Anne Rittstieg
    Peter Balcarek
    Tim Alexander Walde
    Jan P. Schüttrumpf
    Martin M. Wachowski
    Klaus M. Stürmer
    Karl-Heinz Frosch
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 2251 - 2256
  • [32] Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction
    Prado, Maria
    Martin-Castilla, Belen
    Espejo-Reina, Alejandro
    Miguel Serrano-Fernandez, Jose
    Perez-Blanca, Ana
    Ezquerro, Francisco
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (02) : 476 - 484
  • [33] Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction
    María Prado
    Belén Martín-Castilla
    Alejandro Espejo-Reina
    José Miguel Serrano-Fernández
    Ana Pérez-Blanca
    Francisco Ezquerro
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 476 - 484
  • [34] Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods
    Carulli, Christian
    Matassi, Fabrizio
    Soderi, Stefano
    Sirleo, Luigi
    Munz, Giovanni
    Innocenti, Massimo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (04) : 1264 - 1271
  • [35] Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods
    Christian Carulli
    Fabrizio Matassi
    Stefano Soderi
    Luigi Sirleo
    Giovanni Munz
    Massimo Innocenti
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 1264 - 1271
  • [36] Investigation of Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation for the Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament using Interference Screw Merely or in Combination with Supplementary Staple: A Clinical Trial
    Mousavi, Sayed Hamid
    Masoumi, Omid
    Akbariaghdam, Hossein
    Mohammadsharifi, Ghasem
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01): : 52
  • [37] Multistranded hamstring tendon graft fixation with a central four-quadrant or a standard tibial interference screw for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Starch, DW
    Alexander, JW
    Noble, PC
    Reddy, S
    Lintner, DM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03): : 338 - 344
  • [38] Cyclic pull-out strength of hamstring tendon graft fixation with soft tissue interference screws - Influence of screw length
    Stadelmaier, DM
    Lowe, WR
    Ilahi, OA
    Noble, PC
    Kohl, HW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (06): : 778 - 783
  • [39] Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees
    Milano, Giuseppe
    Mulas, Pier Damiano
    Ziranu, Fabio
    Deriu, Laura
    Fabbriciani, Carlo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (06) : 733 - 738
  • [40] Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees
    Giuseppe Milano
    Pier Damiano Mulas
    Fabio Ziranu
    Laura Deriu
    Carlo Fabbriciani
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2007, 15 : 733 - 738